[whatwg] FW: VIDEO and pitchAdjustment

t tested mobile) but do so by simply showing the key frames as they are reached in reverse, in my testing. Firefox, Chrome and Safari on desktop and mobile don’t support negative values at all AFAICT. I have notes here suggesting that mobile platforms don’t even support positive rates other that 1. -- James Ross

[whatwg] FW: DOM Events Proposal: EventListenerOptions 'mayCancel' for improved scroll performance

html#examples example 2 are intended to cover this. -- James Ross

Re: [whatwg] Question about document.referrer (and document.URL, document.location.href) when IDN domains are in use

at > least in some cases. IE 10 shows the non-ASCII chars in all three in the cases I've tried just now. -- James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk

Re: [whatwg] Hide placeholder on input controls on focus

s not prevent the user seeing the placeholder but any attempt to interact with it (by typing, mouse clicking or control-a) removes it. I would be interested in why this behaviour was not adopted in IE10's input[placeholder] implementation. -- James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk

Re: [whatwg] Priority between and content-disposition

and Firefox 19 both specifically say "file from " and make no mention of the page/URL containing the link. Chrome 25 doesn't show the host at all in the primary UI but the "Downloads" window includes the full URL of the file, and nothing about the page containing the link. -- James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk

Re: [whatwg] Hide placeholder on input controls on focus

Opera and Safari hide it when the field gets focus IE 10 hides it when the field gets focus. -- James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk

Re: [whatwg] Background audio channels

ch device to output to (console - not sure what this means, multimedia, communications). -- James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk

Re: [whatwg] Sandboxed IFrames and downloads.

ndbox flag to allow it. -- James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk > From: mk...@google.com > Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:08:35 +0100 > To: wha...@whatwg.org > Subject: Re: [whatwg] Sandboxed IFrames and downloads. > > Ping. Is this a terrible idea? :) > > -- > Mike We

Re: [whatwg] URL: query string

> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:07 PM, James Ross > wrote: > > FWIW, according to http://dump.testsuite.org/url/inspect.html, IE10 gives > > pathname/search as "test"/"?test" in both IE10 and IE9 modes. > > Sweet, is that true for "test:test?test

Re: [whatwg] URL: query string

to http://dump.testsuite.org/url/inspect.html, IE10 gives pathname/search as "test"/"?test" in both IE10 and IE9 modes. -- James Ross sil...@warwickcompsoc.co.uk

Re: [whatwg] Should scrollbars move focus?

> From: o...@chromium.org > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 10:45:07 -0700 > > I didn't test nested scrollbars in Windows. I believe Elliott may have. I > did test them on Mac and Ubuntu. Clicking on nested scrollbars doesn't move > focus even if the scrollable element is focusable. On Ubuntu, clicking on >