Is there a revision history anywhere, detailing when the Web developer
edition of HTML
Living Standard at http://developers.whatwg.com is updated and with what
updates? It is a very useful resource, but uncertainty on how up to date it
is diminish it somewhat.
I see, for instance, that it does not
I am trying to make myself clear on how and when to use abbr, if at all,
specifically when it does not need expansion and hence does not a title
attribute.
The point, I guess, is only mark things up if it provides something.
I would say that the sole purpose of using abbr with no title (besides
do it ?
(only that it should be "privileged": able to bypass the usual s.o.p.
restrictions wrt .innerText...)
--
Jorge.
ein explored
> need both a CS-PRNG and more bits, IIRC. Security experts should correct
> amateur-me if I'm mistaken.
.replace( /1]/gm, '1)' ) ?
--
Jorge.
E line length
> limit. For example, Perl's MIME::Base64 has an encode_base64() API that by
> default inserts newlines after 76 characters. (An optional argument allows
> this behavior to be overridden.)
$ openssl enc -base64 ... inserts newlines too.
--
Jorge.
On 04/02/2011, at 19:54, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Jorge wrote:
>
>> unless the spec says *not* to throw but to skip over instead, so that in a
>> few years the cleanup can be ~safely skipped.
>
> Nope. The spec isn't going to change b
On 04/02/2011, at 18:58, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Jorge wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wrt to the note "some base64 encoders add newlines or other whitespace to
>> their output. atob() throws an exception if its input contains characters
>
On 04/02/2011, at 17:49, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 2/4/11 11:37 AM, Jorge wrote:
>> Wrt to the note "some base64 encoders add newlines or other whitespace to
>> their output. atob() throws an exception if its input contains characters
>> other than +/=0-9A-Za-z, so o
ything other than +/=0-9A-Za-z you could just pass it directly,
and the whole process would be even faster too, given there was no need to
clean it up first. FWIW, that's how nodejs is doing it right now.
Also, some tools (e.g. the openssl decoder) *expect* the newlines to be there,
and fai
s.
>
> While you're discussing efficient handoff of ArrayBuffer, do you also keep in
> mind efficient handoff of other objects (e.g. ImageData) as discussed in this
> thread?:
> http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-January/029885.html
>
> cheers
> --
> Simon Pieters
> Opera Software
Yes. Please. +1
Cheers,
--
Jorge.
On 14/01/2011, at 15:10, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 1/14/11 5:42 AM, Jorge wrote:
>> Are you sure there's really a "maybe" for methods ?
>> Methods' functions have access to (at least) the sender's global context and
>> contexts can't be
On 15/01/2011, at 17:57, Simon Pieters wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:04:03 +0100, Jorge wrote:
>
>>> Structured clone currently doesn't support Functions.
>>
>> Good. And if I understand it correctly (*), it does make a shallow copy,
>> ignoring the pro
On 13/01/2011, at 22:15, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 1/13/11 3:19 PM, Jorge wrote:
>> On 13/01/2011, at 15:41, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>>> On 1/13/11 7:24 AM, Jorge wrote:
>>>> Not too long ago, the browsers did allow timeouts of less than 10ms.
>>>
>>>
uctured-cloning-algorithm
Simon, what are your feelings about this proposed mechanism to
pass-by-reference and make-unreachable ?
Do you think it's feasible, too ?
--
Jorge.
On 13/01/2011, at 22:15, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 1/13/11 3:19 PM, Jorge wrote:
>
>> I think so too for objects composed only of data properties, but what about
>> methods ? getters ? setters ? and prototypes ?
>
> "Maybe". It'd certainly take more wor
is that 10MB is larger than half my L3 cache. If
> I stick to arrays that are small enough that both source and destination fit
> in the cache, things are much faster.
Right, and there's neither the need to duplicate them, nor to occupy say
300Mb/s of memory bandwidth memcpying frames @ 30 fps, nor to trash 5*30 ms of
cpu time per second, gratuitously, when it can be avoided.
--
Jorge.
On 13/01/2011, at 15:41, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 1/13/11 7:24 AM, Jorge wrote:
>> Not too long ago, the browsers did allow timeouts of less than 10ms.
>
> Uh, no. Not too long ago browsers did not allow timeouts of less than 10ms,
> ever.
Last time I checked that in 2008,
. I don't think that would be a problem. You should code accordingly,
or guard accesses with try/catch blocks. But the benefits would be huge, imo.
--
Jorge.
it, just to pass a reference to the worker, it would take
about < 1 ns.
--
Jorge.
oon as passed to the worker. Perhaps other constraints might need to exist,
e.g. perhaps no methods allowed in these objects.
This would make the transfers lightning fast, especially for heavy objects like
images.
This would allow a threaded program to spend the time where it's worth, doing
useful work, instead of copying data over and over, as it happens now.
Is it possible to achieve something like that ?
--
Jorge.
long enough to generate a contextual menu" ?
We need a mechanism to detect accurately the features of the browser our code's
running in, without relying to UA sniffing madness.
--
Jorge.
To the correct list this time...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jorge Bay Gondra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008/6/12
Subject: nav Element
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all,
About the nav element:
I was trying to imaging how it would be to build a site, and I realized
that,
fying hierarchy for navs elements?
Regards to all!
Jorge
Note: In the nav sample (
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-root.html#the-nav)
that includes several places with links, should be a good idea that the
header and footer list of links have to be represented in an
23 matches
Mail list logo
