Re: [whatwg] Making cross-domain overlays more user-friendly

2010-03-04 Thread Rowan Nairn
I'd like to see if I can move this forward a bit. Let's drop some of my original suggestions and break the solution into two separate simple features that we can discuss independently. Firstly, of the problems with overlays listed in my original email ([1]), I think the following are the most

Re: [whatwg] Making cross-domain overlays more user-friendly

2010-02-10 Thread Rowan Nairn
an overlay/infobar would opt to use a method that forces the overlay/infobar to be displayed, even if that means continuing with their current implementations. On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Martin Atkins m...@degeneration.co.uk wrote: Rowan Nairn wrote: Hi, In the spirit of paving some cow

[whatwg] Making cross-domain overlays more user-friendly

2010-02-05 Thread Rowan Nairn
Hi, In the spirit of paving some cow paths I'd like to put forward a proposal for a future version of HTML. The behavior I'm addressing is sites that replace links to external content with a framed version of that content, along with their own overlay of information and links. I think with some

Re: [whatwg] Making cross-domain overlays more user-friendly

2010-02-05 Thread Rowan Nairn
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: On 2/5/10 5:40 PM, Rowan Nairn wrote: - don't introduce new security issues like susceptibility to phishing attacks - The main URL bar should display the framed URL i.e. http://destination-site.com/ I'm having

Re: [whatwg] Making cross-domain overlays more user-friendly

2010-02-05 Thread Rowan Nairn
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: On 2/5/10 5:40 PM, Rowan Nairn wrote: - don't introduce new security issues like susceptibility to phishing attacks - The main URL bar should display the framed URL i.e. http://destination-site.com/ I'm having

[whatwg] a onlyreplace

2009-10-31 Thread Rowan Nairn
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Ian Hickson ian at hixie.ch wrote: My recomendation would be to follow the process for adding features:   http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Is_there_a_process_for_adding_new_features_to_a_specification.3F In particular the bit about experimental

[whatwg] Multi-touch events

2007-01-30 Thread Rowan Nairn
Hi, I'm new to the list so I'm not sure if this is beyond scope or not but has anybody thought about what kind of mouse events we would like to get, say the iPhone (or similar) passes all the touches on to the DOM? I'm thinking the minimal helpful API change would be a new field for the Event