- Original Message -
From: "Schalk Neethling"
To: "Scott González"
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 9:15:19 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] input type=date
Hey Scott,
There will need to be a js, or server side function if js is not available,
function th
format you wish returned.
Schalk
- Original Message -
From: "Scott González"
To: "Schalk Neethling"
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 8:53:13 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] input type=date
I don't believe so. I also don't think there
yep, that answers my question but, is there any work done to perhaps add an
attribute where the author can specify the date format they require/want?
Thanks, Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Scott González"
To: "Schalk Neethling"
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Sent:
Hey all,
Asked this on IRC and got no response so here goes:
Is there a way to specify the locale input type=daye should use or does it
simply use the current locale? If so, does it choose the server locale or the
user locale?
Kind Regards,
Schalk
Web Developer @ Mozilla
Hi Anna,
I heard some mention of using the data-* attributes so, something like:
or
Would you agree that this is the better option?
On 29/09/2011 16:50, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:35:33 +0200, Schalk Neethling
wrote:
Question, would an element with rel="help&q
se enough?
--
Kind Regards,
Schalk Neethling
Mozilla Corporation
Hi all,
I guess a lot of people are asking the question but, what is the state
on the following:
http://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/12/websockets-disabled-in-firefox-4/
Apparently this is the case in Opera as well.
---
Kind Regards,
Schalk Neethling
Passionate Web Developer
Hi all,
I have been working on getting scrollable tables working across all
browsers. While there exists jQuery plugins that does the job for the most
part, I have to find one that works 100% and works at all in Chrome. The
reason I am putting this to the HTML5 list is because I am wondering wh
Oops, I believe there was a misunderstanding here. I did not write the article
;-) I just read and thought I would like to know everyone else’s view on the
list as I do not agree with the author.
Kind Regards,
Schalk Neethling
From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk
Hi all,
Would love to hear everyone's comments on the following article:
http://goo.gl/VNg0
Ah, ok. I see but then I wonder what the problem is with regards to Youtube
and full screen as their full screen mode is fully user driven.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Barth [mailto:w...@adambarth.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 1:22 PM
To: Schalk Neethling
Cc: whatwg
Subject: Re
Could not agree more Anne
-Original Message-
From: whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org]
On Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 1:38 PM
To: Henri Sivonen; Shane Fagan
Cc: Andy Berkheimer; John Harding; wha...@whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [
HTML5 video 'mode' when going to full screen
or do they somehow switch to Flash?
Would be pretty amazing if they do switch to Flash as the video continues
playing from the same frame and does not start from the beginning.
Looking forward to your feedback,
Schalk Neethling
from third
party plugin's and have this baked into the UA instead?
The general idea is good, I just believe implementing this via 3rd party
plugin's is not the best way forward.
Schalk Neethling
From: whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Be
addition of the widget tag. Below is the most
obvious use case and makes much more sense to me. Thoughts?
Kind Regards,
Schalk Neethling
I would also go with not using the visual state of an element as an indication
of whether it needs to be validated or not but rather an additional attribute
link the @hidden attribute proposed earlier.
I do see though that one might ask the question, how will I indicate an error
on a specific f
To: Schalk Neethling
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Canvas and Image problems
You could also add a listener to the image to check that it actually loads:
$(document).ready(function() {
var image = $("#cat").get(0);
image.onload = function(e){
Jip, using $(window).load() works perfect.
-Original Message-
From: Eduard Pascual [mailto:herenva...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 12:33 PM
To: Schalk Neethling
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Canvas and Image problems
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Schalk
Hi there Eduard,
Makes total sense, now why did I not think of that ;p
Thanks,
Schalk
-Original Message-
From: Eduard Pascual [mailto:herenva...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 12:33 PM
To: Schalk Neethling
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Canvas and Image
Hi everyone,
Having a really weird problem that I would like some input on. I am trying
to draw an image, as well as video, onto canvas. I use the simple code
below:
$(document).ready(function() {
var image = $("#cat").get(0);
var cv = $("#img_container").get(0);
On Sat, 08 May 2010 12:12:23 +0100, Schalk Neethling
wrote:
> Ah, no that makes sense TJ, so Opera's current decision was to present
> the user with a Date picker and only allow this. Bruce or Anne, where
> does one file bug or enhancement reports for Opera?
> You can
Thanks Bruce, will have a read over yours before adding my own.
Kind Regards,
Schalk
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Lawson [mailto:bru...@opera.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2010 1:17 PM
To: 'Tab Atkins Jr.'; Schalk Neethling
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg]
Ah, no that makes sense TJ, so Opera's current decision was to present the user
with a Date picker and only allow this. Bruce or Anne, where does one file bug
or enhancement reports for Opera?
Kind Regards,
Schalk Neethling
-Original Message-
From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:ja
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Schalk Neethling
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Are there any talks at the moment whether the type=date input will allow a
> user to enter a date manually or use the date picker or, should developers
> fall back to using a standard input field and add
to
type=date or is the fallback the best option?
Thanks,
Schalk
-Original Message-
From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:40 PM
To: Schalk Neethling
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Type Date
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:19 PM
Greetings,
Are there any talks at the moment whether the type=date input will allow a user
to enter a date manually or use the date picker or, should developers fall back
to using a standard input field and add the date picker via JavaScript?
Kind Regards,
Schalk Neethling
Might be a wrong assumption but, if you place those values into an HTML
element, it is visible by simply doing a view source. I am jumping in the
middle of the conversation here but, this strikes me as opening another problem.
Schalk
-Original Message-
From: whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.
If the pattern email will map to a default of evaluating the input as if you
used type=email you may have a problem but, if you have the specific need
mentioned, change your pattern?
Schalk Neethling
-Original Message-
From: whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-boun
containing text in a link,
that would work fine.
Going forward, the same developer can opt into using the new uri attribute of
cite as opposed to wrapping the text in a link.
Schalk Neethling
-Original Message-
From: whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatw
Hi there all,
I absolutely love the fact that browsers will have certain validation baked in
like email addresses etc. With that, is there currently a way to, or plans to
add a way, where the way the browser displays these errors can be styled with
CSS?
Kind Regards,
Schalk
Of Smylers
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 3:18 PM
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] RFC:
Schalk Neethling writes:
> if your username field will be in the form of an email address, then
> simply use type=username with a pattern to facilitate email
> validation.
Surel
because you are not
really concerned over a well formed email address.
If that was a problem, it would have been detected during registration.
Schalk Neethling
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Broyer [mailto:t.bro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 12:09 PM
To: Markus Ernst
Cc
Hi all,
I really like this idea, how would this be handled from a presentational point
of view? I guess it will be a CSS style issue but, will browsers implement some
standard way of displaying these cite elements if it has the uri attribute?
Schalk Neethling
From: whatwg-boun
The way I see it is that instead of browsers traversing the DOM looking for
an input field of either id=username or name=username or even
class=username, they now only have to look for an input of type username.
Makes it a lot easier for both developers and browser vendors as they now
only have to
I personally like the idea of having a type of username for an input field,
makes sense based on the use case.
Kind Regards,
Schalk Neethling
-Original Message-
From: whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org]
On Behalf Of Dirk Pranke
Sent: Wednesday, May
35 matches
Mail list logo
