> On Apr 1, 2015, at 10:35 PM, David Young wrote:
>
> I cannot take for granted
> the good will of the web developer, and even developers with good
> intentions may make a mistake or cut corners.
Trust me, you’re preaching to the choir on that!
> It seems to me that the UA should divvy up reso
> On Mar 31, 2015, at 9:42 AM, Roger Hågensen wrote:
>
> Would not a ad delivery network prefer not to have to push ads out that the
> user is not seeing at all?
> If not then they are only wasting bandwidth/CPU/memory on the server, and
> causing impressions that are wasted on nothing (import
t 3:47 PM, Seth Fowler wrote:
>
> I think we should modify the Page Visibility spec to let UA’s take actual
> visibility of iframes into account when deciding if an iframe is hidden.
>
> Right now, the visibility of an iframe is the same as that of the top level
> browsing con
I think we should modify the Page Visibility spec to let UA’s take actual
visibility of iframes into account when deciding if an iframe is hidden.
Right now, the visibility of an iframe is the same as that of the top level
browsing context it’s embedded in. Here are the details:
http://www.w3.o
> On Mar 13, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
> If it happens at the markup level, it should *definitely* affect the
> naturalWidth/Height properties. I don't think that's in question at
> all. But nobody's moved on the markup issue, so I haven't removed the
> CSS property yet. ^_^
The more I think about this, the more I agree with David. It really does make
more sense to act like the rotation is part of the image format, because after
all it *is*, at least when from-image is used.
This approach also gives us a smoother path to eventually respecting EXIF
orientation by de
> On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:06 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
>
> On 3/9/15, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> That's a good question. I suspect that .naturalWidth/Height should
>> return the image's dimensions before applying CSS rotations.
>
> I think that that is not what Seth was asking about. IIUC, he asked
Hi all!
I wanted to get the opinion of this list on how image-orientation and the
element’s naturalWidth and naturalHeight properties should interact. The
css-images level 3 spec says:
"The intrinsic height and width are derived from the rotated rather than the
original image dimensions.”
Th
