Thank you Erik - this is what I was looking for.
Regards,
-Vlad
http://xhtml.com
Original Message
From: Erik Dahlstr�m
Date: 2008-01-28 11:16 AM
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:34:32 +0100, Vlad Alexander (xhtml.com)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Erik,
Thanks Erik, but I still
:10:08 +1100, Vlad Alexander (xhtml.com)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Charles,
Thanks for looking into this. Here you go:
http://xhtml.com/misc/svg-img1.htm
http://xhtml.com/misc/svg-img2.htm
http://xhtml.com/misc/svg-img3.htm
The referenced svg file doesn't define an intrinsic ratio
,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:50:45 +1100, Vlad Alexander (xhtml.com)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I tested Opera's support for SVG through the img element and it
incorrectly clips the SVG image. The width and height attributes of
the img element need to set the viewport for the SVG image and scale
Embedding SVG by reference (thought the img element) is well suited to HTML.
SVG was designed for this as stated in Embedding by reference section here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/concepts.html#UsageOptions
I tested Opera's support for SVG through the img element and it incorrectly
clips the
Daniel wrote:
SVGs *explicitly* state their size
So do raster images.
Daniel wrote:
To change the size, you would actually be violating
the content of the image file itself.
But that is exactly what SVG editors do - they let users scale the SVG images.
Any application that does a thumbnail
Hi Daniel,
Sorry, I still don't get it. A raster (bitmap) image, which _isn't_ really
designed to scale, has intrinsic size yet it is scaled by the IMG's width
and height attributes. Why isn't an image that _is_ designed to scale not
scaled by the IMG's width and height attributes?
Regards,
Anne, on a semi-related topic, can you please help me understand why Opera does
not scale the SVG image when loaded via IMG element? Here is a test page:
http://xhtml.com/misc/svg-img.htm
Regards,
-Vlad
http://xhtml.com
Original Message
From: Anne van Kesteren
Date:
PM
On 10/25/07, Vlad Alexander (xhtml.com) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Request for the HTML 5 forms section:
Alternate content such as form controls should not participate in the HTTP
POST if the object can be rendered. In this example, if logo.gif can be
rendered, then data from textarea should
I noticed that the latest HTML 5 draft states that the name and codebase
attributes are not allowed on the object element.
1. Plug-ins, such as XStandard, use the name attribute for submitting content
to the server without the need for JavaScript. This makes for an accessible
solution.
I noticed that Opera 9.5 can load an SVG image via the IMG element. I think
this is a wonderful thing. Is there any specification on how this should work?
For example, I noticed that Opera, for some reason, does not scale SVG images
to fit the box created by the IMG element's width and height
4. One of the biggest problems with HTML is that content authors can get away
with writing tag soup. As a result, most content authors don't feel the need
to write markup to specification. When markup is not written to specification,
CSS may not get applied correctly, JavaScript may not execute
Thank you Ian. Just one follow-up question. You wrote:
...We could require editors to do this, but since nobody knows
how to do it, it would be a stupid requirement. ...
Is it due to a flaw in HTML that it is difficult to build authoring tools, such
as WYSIWYG editors, that generate markup
Why do we need X/HTML 5? When did this need become apparent?
X/HTML 5 is currently in Working Draft stage. What is the tentative timetable
for moving X/HTML 5 through the standards approval process towards
Recommendation stage?
X/HTML 5 introduces new markup constructs such as sectioning elements,
enhancements to the input element, a construct for dialogs, a way to mark up
figures, and much more. Can you briefly describe these new constructs and the
reason they were added?
15 matches
Mail list logo
