On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 11:12 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
I have untrusted markup from a third party which I would like to
safely insert into my page, knowing that the rest of my page is safe
from whatever the untrusted markup is doing. Also, the untrusted
markup may be doing expensive
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 15:24 -0500, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
1) If your script is no-cache, or max-age:0, does IE make a new
request for it for every script element?
For the most part this seems to be the case but there are two exceptions:
a) Before a URL loads, if it's assigned to another
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
Uh... In that situation I would expect the event handler to
keep the script alive until the load finishes.
Anything else is just a bug that exposes GC timing to the web page.
Yes, quite strange. It's fixed in IE9 (at
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
Would a means by which authors can mark a pre-fetched script as
stale allay some of your concerns?
I wouldn't expect anyone to actually use such a means.
Understandable.
I ask because at one point you stated if DOM
On Feb 15, 2011 6:34 PM, Nicholas Zakas nza...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
1) Should the default behavior for dynamic script nodes be to start
downloading the file upon the setting of src and only execute when added to
the document (IE's behavior) or not?
Could the default behavior be defined by the
On Feb 11, 2011 12:31 PM, Will Alexander serverher...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2011 10:41 AM, Nicholas Zakas nza...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
We've gone back and forth around implementation specifics, and now I'd
like to get a general feeling on direction. It seems that enough people
On Feb 11, 2011 10:41 AM, Nicholas Zakas nza...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
We've gone back and forth around implementation specifics, and now I'd like
to get a general feeling on direction. It seems that enough people understand
why a solution like this is important, both on the desktop and for
clouded this
thread with more slightly-related-but-mostly-off-topic fud.
-N
-Original Message-
From: whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:
whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Will Alexander
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 12:58 PM
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re
Doesn't link rel=prefetch mostly address the use-case of
load-but-don't-execute in markup? The reason script-inserted script elements
need this capability is more advanced than any use-case for why you'd do so
in markup. In other words, I can't imagine that a script loader would rely
on
arrow keys work while shift is
active (an attempt to influence selection length/shape).
I've heard rumors that Qt has (plans?) for some magical way to control
position.
Alexander Surkov's proposal also doesn't covered BiDi behavior
Also, it's unclear to me what the goal is. Should I
this issue
for discussion.
I'm happy you find the described behaviour reasonable.
Thank you again.
Alex.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Alexander Surkov wrote:
The suggestion is to treat control element as special character, i.e.
when you move
Hi.
HTML 5 contentEditable section doesn't define behaviour of HTML form
controls inside of editable area explicitly
(http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#user-editing-actions). The
question is the following: is behaviour on keyboard or mouse
interaction with form controls inside of
Thank you Erik - this is what I was looking for.
Regards,
-Vlad
http://xhtml.com
Original Message
From: Erik Dahlstr�m
Date: 2008-01-28 11:16 AM
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:34:32 +0100, Vlad Alexander (xhtml.com)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Erik,
Thanks Erik, but I still
:10:08 +1100, Vlad Alexander (xhtml.com)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Charles,
Thanks for looking into this. Here you go:
http://xhtml.com/misc/svg-img1.htm
http://xhtml.com/misc/svg-img2.htm
http://xhtml.com/misc/svg-img3.htm
The referenced svg file doesn't define an intrinsic ratio
,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:50:45 +1100, Vlad Alexander (xhtml.com)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I tested Opera's support for SVG through the img element and it
incorrectly clips the SVG image. The width and height attributes of
the img element need to set the viewport for the SVG image and scale
Embedding SVG by reference (thought the img element) is well suited to HTML.
SVG was designed for this as stated in Embedding by reference section here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/concepts.html#UsageOptions
I tested Opera's support for SVG through the img element and it incorrectly
clips the
Daniel wrote:
SVGs *explicitly* state their size
So do raster images.
Daniel wrote:
To change the size, you would actually be violating
the content of the image file itself.
But that is exactly what SVG editors do - they let users scale the SVG images.
Any application that does a thumbnail
Hi Daniel,
Sorry, I still don't get it. A raster (bitmap) image, which _isn't_ really
designed to scale, has intrinsic size yet it is scaled by the IMG's width
and height attributes. Why isn't an image that _is_ designed to scale not
scaled by the IMG's width and height attributes?
Regards,
Anne, on a semi-related topic, can you please help me understand why Opera does
not scale the SVG image when loaded via IMG element? Here is a test page:
http://xhtml.com/misc/svg-img.htm
Regards,
-Vlad
http://xhtml.com
Original Message
From: Anne van Kesteren
Date:
PM
On 10/25/07, Vlad Alexander (xhtml.com) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Request for the HTML 5 forms section:
Alternate content such as form controls should not participate in the HTTP
POST if the object can be rendered. In this example, if logo.gif can be
rendered, then data from textarea should
I noticed that the latest HTML 5 draft states that the name and codebase
attributes are not allowed on the object element.
1. Plug-ins, such as XStandard, use the name attribute for submitting content
to the server without the need for JavaScript. This makes for an accessible
solution.
I noticed that Opera 9.5 can load an SVG image via the IMG element. I think
this is a wonderful thing. Is there any specification on how this should work?
For example, I noticed that Opera, for some reason, does not scale SVG images
to fit the box created by the IMG element's width and height
quantity field:
!--- loop via quantity fields ---!
if (quantity.key == '----') { ... }
!--- end of loop ---!
Regards,
Alexander.
The simple name/value pairs that form submission is organized in are
sufficient for expressing data structures of any complexity.
Multidimensional keys like (name, key) in your example can be expressed
through combined names:
input type=text name=quantity:{id_value_here} value=
4. One of the biggest problems with HTML is that content authors can get away
with writing tag soup. As a result, most content authors don't feel the need
to write markup to specification. When markup is not written to specification,
CSS may not get applied correctly, JavaScript may not execute
Thank you Ian. Just one follow-up question. You wrote:
...We could require editors to do this, but since nobody knows
how to do it, it would be a stupid requirement. ...
Is it due to a flaw in HTML that it is difficult to build authoring tools, such
as WYSIWYG editors, that generate markup
Why do we need X/HTML 5? When did this need become apparent?
X/HTML 5 is currently in Working Draft stage. What is the tentative timetable
for moving X/HTML 5 through the standards approval process towards
Recommendation stage?
X/HTML 5 introduces new markup constructs such as sectioning elements,
enhancements to the input element, a construct for dialogs, a way to mark up
figures, and much more. Can you briefly describe these new constructs and the
reason they were added?
29 matches
Mail list logo
