Re: [whatwg] The src-N proposal

2013-11-18 Thread matmarquis.com
On Nov 18, at 10:34 AM, Jirka Kosek wrote: On 18.11.2013 14:38, Marcos Caceres wrote: we really need to, srcset. The developer community already made significant sacrifices in compromising on picture because of issues that implementers raised about nested elements Are those issues with

Re: [whatwg] imgset responsive imgs proposition (Re: The src-N proposal)

2013-11-16 Thread matmarquis.com
On Nov 16, at 4:25 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote: On 11/15/13 9:48 PM, matmarquis.com m...@matmarquis.com wrote: I©öd say the likelihood of a project not using a content image directory a step or two from root is roughly the same as the likelihood that I©öm hot-linking to images on someone

Re: [whatwg] imgset responsive imgs proposition (Re: The src-N proposal)

2013-11-15 Thread matmarquis.com
On Nov 15, at 12:12 PM, Shane Hudson wrote: Could I just please clarify, since its been hard to follow the conversation, that having the style internal means that the prefetcher can still handle the images properly? Also, we seem to be operating under the assumption that requiring in-page CSS

Re: [whatwg] imgset responsive imgs proposition (Re: The src-N proposal)

2013-11-15 Thread matmarquis.com
On Nov 15, at 12:27 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote: Any thoughts on my concerns with making inline CSS mandatory (especially from the CSP angle)? CSP 1.1 supports securing inline style and script with nonces and/or hashes. OK, since the latest proposals keep the URLs outside the style,

Re: [whatwg] imgset responsive imgs proposition (Re: The src-N proposal)

2013-11-12 Thread matmarquis.com
This is possible using a set of proposals already underway, last I checked in on them: http://nicolasgallagher.com/responsive-images-using-css3/ Considering the delay involved in skipping the preparser and waiting for CSS to download (as well as the fact that the `src` *will* be prefetched,