Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Hixie wrote in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18669#c31 :
I think it's fine for this not to work in XML, or require XML changes,
or use an attribute like xml:component= in XML. It's not going to be
used in
Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu-4 wrote:
Yep. I would encourage you to play with XHTML5 (application/xhtml+xml)
more and report bugs to browsers. When I still had interest in
application/xhtml+xml (back in 2007?), I got troubled by all the
differences in the DOM APIs. I think currently most JS
-in-depth against XSS attacks
in the future.
Yuhong Bao
them to update their products in their next release cycle.
--Ted Johnson for IEBlog
From: Yuhong Bao [yuhongbao_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 9:52 PM
To: IEBlog Administration
Subject: MSDN Blogs: Contact request
Kornel Lesiński wrote:
Parsing of non-HTML elements is not interoperable between IE and non-IE
browsers. IE already supports self-closing syntax on prefixed elements,
but other browsers don't:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
The spec gives:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/cc305154.aspx
as the reference for Windows 949. If you click on the higher-byte
links, which are supposed to link to further code tables, the links
are
