On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Bruno Racineux br...@hexanet.net wrote:
On 1/26/14 3:39 PM, Qebui Nehebkau qebui.nehebkau+wha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Bruno Racineux br...@hexanet.net
wrote:
What exactly do you find misguided, can you be more specific?
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Bruno Racineux br...@hexanet.net wrote:
What exactly do you find misguided, can you be more specific?
Basically, - and I'm trying not to over-elaborate here, since my
opinion isn't really very important - I just mean that I don't think
there should be any
On 1/26/14 3:39 PM, Qebui Nehebkau qebui.nehebkau+wha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Bruno Racineux br...@hexanet.net wrote:
What exactly do you find misguided, can you be more specific?
Basically, - and I'm trying not to over-elaborate here, since my
opinion isn't
On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:52 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 1/23/14 9:13 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
Could 'resource control' be an associated spec of the 'hidden' attribute?
It bothers me, at first glance, to overload the attribute to mean different
things. I predict people will
On 1/24/14 7:35 AM, David Newton da...@davidnewton.ca wrote:
On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:52 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 1/23/14 9:13 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
Could 'resource control' be an associated spec of the 'hidden'
attribute?
It bothers me, at first glance, to overload
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Bruno Racineux br...@hexanet.net wrote:
The requirement for ATs with 'hidden' is to access the structure of hidden
elements. Not the presentation aspect... I am having a hard time
translating that a resources that is not yet needed or is no longer
needed means
On 1/24/14 7:37 PM, Qebui Nehebkau qebui.nehebkau+wha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Bruno Racineux br...@hexanet.net wrote:
The requirement for ATs with 'hidden' is to access the structure of
hidden
elements. Not the presentation aspect... I am having a hard time
On 1/22/14 6:07 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 1/22/14 8:14 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
Meanwhile, is there a way in which all vendors can prevent their
pre-loaders from preloading (and loading at all for that matter) any
img
that has either: An html5 hidden attribute
This is
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Bruno Racineux br...@hexanet.net wrote:
On 1/22/14 6:07 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 1/22/14 8:14 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
Meanwhile, is there a way in which all vendors can prevent their
pre-loaders from preloading (and loading at all for that
On 1/23/14 9:13 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
Then how come it is the case right now for both:
object style=display:none data=image.png
Gecko's preloader never preloads objects. There are various reasons
for this, but the most important one is that in practice it doesn't
matter for actual web
10 matches
Mail list logo
