On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Justin Novosad
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Justin Novosad wrote:
Current text: If the point (x0, y0) is equal to the point (x1, y1),
or if the point (x1, y1) is equal to the point (x2, y2), or if both
radiusX and radiusY are zero, then
On Mar 17, 2014, at 3:49 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Justin Novosad wrote:
Current text: If the point (x0, y0) is equal to the point (x1, y1),
or if the point (x1, y1) is equal to the
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
Hmmm, I gave this a bit more thought... To apply the construction
algorithm in transformed space, the ellipse parameters (radiusX,
radiusY,
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com
wrote:
Hmmm, I gave this a bit more thought... To apply the construction
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
Make a clean cut and define that drawing operators are ignored when
there's a non-invertible matrix.
I could totally go for that, but you are talking about going back on the
spec of a feature that has shipped, as
On Mar 17, 2014, at 9:23 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
Make a clean cut and define that drawing operators are ignored when there's a
non-invertible matrix.
I could totally go for that, but
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
Make a clean cut and define that drawing operators are ignored when
there's a non-invertible matrix.
I could totally go for that, but you
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
I have a fix in flight that fixes that problem in Blink by storing the
current path in transformed coordinates instead. I've had the fix on the
back burner pending the outcome of this thread.
That seems like an
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
I have a fix in flight that fixes that problem in Blink by storing the
current path in transformed coordinates instead. I've had the fix on
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
I have a fix in flight that fixes that problem in Blink by storing
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Justin Novosad wrote:
Current text: If the point (x0, y0) is equal to the point (x1, y1),
or if the point (x1, y1) is equal to the point (x2, y2), or if both
radiusX and radiusY are zero, then the method must add the point
(x1, y1) to the subpath, and connect
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Justin Novosad wrote:
I am looking into correcting Chrome's behavior to make it spec-compliant
in
this case. There is one specific primitive that is proving problematic:
arcTo
The problem is that
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The second does setTransform(0,0,0,0,0,0), which should reset the CTM
to a zero matrix (again, not invertible). IE, Opera and FF draw a
line to 0,0 and close the path afterwards (which kind of makes sense,
since the
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Justin Novosad wrote:
I am looking into correcting Chrome's behavior to make it spec-compliant in
this case. There is one specific primitive that is proving problematic:
arcTo
The problem is that the algorithm needs to bring the last point in the
subpath into the arc's
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The second does setTransform(0,0,0,0,0,0), which should reset the
CTM
to a zero matrix (again, not invertible). IE, Opera and FF draw a
line to
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Dirk Schulze wrote:
scale(0) is invalid, and should throw an exception.
I don't think that we want to throw an exception on scale(0). No browser
does that today. WebKit did it in some places in the past but removed
the exceptions.
WebIDL says it should throw a
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Dirk Schulze wrote:
The spec doesn't have any wording about the behavior on non-invertible
CTMs on Canvas contexts. Is it still possible to add segments to the
current path once a CTM is not invertible anymore? Does the path get
rejected completely then?
Hi,
The spec doesn't have any wording about the behavior on non-invertible CTMs on
Canvas contexts. Is it still possible to add segments to the current path once
a CTM is not invertible anymore? Does the path get rejected completely then?
Implementations are fairly different.
Here are two
20 matches
Mail list logo
