Ian Hickson a écrit :
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, David Bruant wrote:
>
>> This is a new proposal taking into account the feedback I recieved to
>> the "[WebWorkers] About the delegation example" message.
>>
>> In the delegation example of the WebWorker spec, we can see this line :
>> "var num_worke
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, David Bruant wrote:
>
> This is a new proposal taking into account the feedback I recieved to
> the "[WebWorkers] About the delegation example" message.
>
> In the delegation example of the WebWorker spec, we can see this line :
> "var num_workers = 10;"
>
> My concern is a
On 11/12/09 7:24 PM, David Bruant wrote:
=> I think it happens very often. While I'm writing this e-mail, "no
process" is running. About fifty processes are runnable, but not
running. They are passively waiting. My CPU is barely used.
Interesting. I have several browser processes using timesl
Boris Zbarsky a écrit :
> On 11/12/09 3:40 PM, David Bruant wrote:
>> I reformulate this way the conditions 2 and 3:
>> - In "blank conditions" (no other processes/thread running on the CPU,
>> enough memory to allocate the workers), running the same algorithm (an
>> easy delegation algorithm) has
On 11/12/09 3:40 PM, David Bruant wrote:
=> If you are comparing "no other processes running" and "one other
process which is also completely cpu-bound running", you are not in what
I've called "same running conditions". (because the number of concurrent
processes is different).
Yes, but your
Boris Zbarsky a écrit :
> On 11/12/09 12:49 PM, David Bruant wrote:
>> => You're perfectly right. I reformulate the definition of "running
>> conditions" (appearing in condition 2 and 3) as :
>> "same memory available, same number of process running concurrently, no
>> other worker running working
On 11/12/09 12:49 PM, David Bruant wrote:
=> You're perfectly right. I reformulate the definition of "running
conditions" (appearing in condition 2 and 3) as :
"same memory available, same number of process running concurrently, no
other worker running working on the same document".
That doesn
Boris Zbarsky a écrit :
> On 11/11/09 10:19 PM, David Bruant wrote:
>> This attribute have the following properties :
>> - It's only dependant on the hardware, the operating system and the
>> WebWorker implementation (thus, it is not dynamically computed by the
>> user agent at each call and two ca
On 11/11/09 10:19 PM, David Bruant wrote:
This attribute have the following properties :
- It's only dependant on the hardware, the operating system and the
WebWorker implementation (thus, it is not dynamically computed by the
user agent at each call and two calls in the same
hardware//OS//WebWor
Hi,
This is a new proposal taking into account the feedback I recieved to
the "[WebWorkers] About the delegation example" message.
In the delegation example of the WebWorker spec, we can see this line :
"var num_workers = 10;"
My concern is about the arbitrarity of the "10".
Regarding the hardwa
10 matches
Mail list logo
