Re: [whatwg] dl definition issue

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Simon Pieters wrote: > > > > I just removed the argument and just pointed to . > > If there is no argument as to why is inappropriate for marking up > dialogue, maybe we should drop and say that is appropriate > for marking up dialogue. There is an argument (it's the sam

Re: [whatwg] dl definition issue

IMHO the one definition rule is common knowledge and belongs to what constitutes reasonable content; the HTML specification should not try to replace common sense or enforce logical correctness of the author's publication. Chris

Re: [whatwg] dl definition issue

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:41:29 +0200, Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > My explanation: > > Since the terms defined within a DL are normally unique (each term is > defined exactly once), DL is inappropriate for marking up dialogue where > the > speakers talk in turns. If so, maybe the spec should sa

Re: [whatwg] dl definition issue

My explanation: Since the terms defined within a DL are normally unique (each term is defined exactly once), DL is inappropriate for marking up dialogue where the speakers talk in turns. HTH, Chris

Re: [whatwg] dl definition issue

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:17:11 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Rikkert Koppes wrote: >> >> At the dl element definition [1] >> >> a) "The order of the list of groups, and of the names and values within >> each >> group, may be significant." >> b) The |dl >>

Re: [whatwg] dl definition issue

On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Rikkert Koppes wrote: > > At the dl element definition [1] > > a) "The order of the list of groups, and of the names and values within each > group, may be significant." > b) The |dl > | element > is inappropria

[whatwg] dl definition issue

At the dl element definition [1] a) "The order of the list of groups, and of the names and values within each group, may be significant." b) The |dl | element is inappropriate for marking up dialogue, since dialogue is ordered