Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2008-05-08 Thread Křištof Želechovski
; Ian Hickson Subject: Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec On May 6, 2008, at 9:38 PM, Peter Kasting wrote: On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 8.2.1 do not have to actually create a DOM Document object do not actually have to create

Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2008-05-06 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Geoffrey Garen wrote: 1.4 when not qualified to explicitly refer when not qualified explicitly to refer (split infinitive) I prefer the current text. or the node itself is there is none or the node itself if there is none (typo) Fixed. The term root element,

Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2008-05-06 Thread Peter Kasting
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Geoffrey Garen wrote: 1.4 when not qualified to explicitly refer when not qualified explicitly to refer (split infinitive) I prefer the current text. How about when not qualified to refer

Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2008-05-06 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 6 May 2008, Peter Kasting wrote: On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Geoffrey Garen wrote: 1.4 when not qualified to explicitly refer when not qualified explicitly to refer (split infinitive) I prefer the current

Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2008-05-06 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 6, 2008, at 9:38 PM, Peter Kasting wrote: On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 8.2.1 do not have to actually create a DOM Document object do not actually have to create a DOM Document object (split infinitive) I prefer the split version. FWIW I

Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2007-06-04 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Geoffrey Garen wrote: Some of the algorithms in this specification, for historical reasons, require the user agent to pause until some condition has been met. While a user agent is paused, it must ensure that no scripts execute (e.g. no event handlers, no timers,

Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2007-04-15 Thread Kristof Zelechovski
Of Geoffrey Garen Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec Hi folks. I just read through the HTML5 spec for the first time. It looks great, and I appreciate all the hard work that everyone has done. While reading through

Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2007-04-15 Thread Geoffrey Garen
Pressing a button when the user agent is in paused state should cause the button to remain pressed until the user agent wakes up and execution of the associated event handlers should be deferred. So, if I had N buttons in a page, does that mean that all N could potentially end up in a

Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2007-04-15 Thread Kristof Zelechovski
editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec Pressing a button when the user agent is in paused state should cause the button to remain pressed until the user agent wakes up and execution of the associated event handlers should be deferred. So, if I had N buttons in a page, does that mean

Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2007-04-15 Thread Kristof Zelechovski
Yes, they could, just like storey buttons in the lift. Chris -Original Message- From: Geoffrey Garen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 8:32 PM To: Kristof Zelechovski Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec Pressing

Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2007-04-15 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Apr 14, 2007, at 10:01 PM, gary turner wrote: Maciej Stachowiak wrote: On Apr 14, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote: 1.4 when not qualified to explicitly refer when not qualified explicitly to refer (split infinitive) The split infinitive is not generally considered a grammatical

[whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2007-04-14 Thread Geoffrey Garen
Hi folks. I just read through the HTML5 spec for the first time. It looks great, and I appreciate all the hard work that everyone has done. While reading through, I noticed a few edits that might improve clarity. I'm posting them here in a take 'em or leave 'em fashion -- take what you

Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2007-04-14 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Apr 14, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote: 1.4 when not qualified to explicitly refer when not qualified explicitly to refer (split infinitive) The split infinitive is not generally considered a grammatical error these days. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split_infinitive for

Re: [whatwg] A few editing suggestions for the HTML5 spec

2007-04-14 Thread gary turner
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: On Apr 14, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote: 1.4 when not qualified to explicitly refer when not qualified explicitly to refer (split infinitive) The split infinitive is not generally considered a grammatical error these days. See