On 2/1/11 11:47 AM, Adam de Boor wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
I've been playing with application cache for a while now, and found
the
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
> > On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 May 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've been playing with application cache for a while now, and found
> > > > the diagnostic
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> It appears you're actually talking about ClickOnce manifests, not SxS
> manifests (though they use the same format).
>
(In that particular case, SxS manifests distributed standalone for people to
drop into application installations when troub
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> > Given that SxS manifests don't seem like they'd ever be something
> > you'd want to make available to download standalone, and that if you
> > were going to expose them to a user you'd want a
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> > > > That's far too generic for servers to default to mapping *.manifest
> > > > to text/cache-manifest. For example, Windows uses *.man
* Glenn Maynard wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> > That's far too generic for servers to default to mapping *.manifest to
>> > text/cache-manifest. For example, Windows uses *.manifest for SxS
>> > assembly manifests.
>>
>> Do they have a MIME type? If not, it doesn'
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> > > That's far too generic for servers to default to mapping *.manifest
> > > to text/cache-manifest. For example, Windows uses *.manifest for
> > > SxS assembly manifests.
> >
> > Do they have
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > That's far too generic for servers to default to mapping *.manifest to
> > text/cache-manifest. For example, Windows uses *.manifest for SxS
> > assembly manifests.
>
> Do they have a MIME type? If not, it doesn't much matter.
>
It does if
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, David John Burrowes wrote:
> > >
> > > I can understand wanting to do things right, in terms of using
> > > Content-Type for the file. I can also attest that it can be a royal
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, David John Burrowes wrote:
> >
> > I can understand wanting to do things right, in terms of using
> > Content-Type for the file. I can also attest that it can be a royal
> > pain to diagnose when this is set wrong. I won
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
> On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> > >
> > > XML would be much too complex for what is needed. We could possibly
> > > remove the media type check and resort to using the "CACHE MANIFEST"
> > >
On 2010/8/13, at 上午6:42, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:02:01 +0200, Patrick Mueller
> wrote:
>> On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
XML would be much too complex for what is needed. We could possibly
remove the me
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:02:01 +0200, Patrick Mueller
wrote:
On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
XML would be much too complex for what is needed. We could possibly
remove the media type check and resort to using the "CACHE MANIFEST"
identifier (
On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
I've been playing with application cache for a while now, and found the
diagnostic information available to be sorely lacking.
For example, to diagnose user-land errors that occur when using
appcache, this is t
On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
XML would be much too complex for what is needed. We could possibly
remove the media type check and resort to using the "CACHE MANIFEST"
identifier (i.e. "sniffing"), but the HTTP gods will get angry.
Yeah,
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> These quotas are often global, some kind of user setting, or are
>> per-origin. Application Caches are missing such a quota.
>>
>> The entire "Disk Space" section of Web SQL Databases could equally apply
>> to Application Caches: http://dev.w3.
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
>
> There seems to be a race condition in how application cache groups are
> marked obsolete. Consider the following scenario:
>
> 1. A document is loaded from server, an appcache is fully created.
> 2. Appcache update is initiated (e.g. by calling
17 matches
Mail list logo
