On 3/2/2011 12:07 AM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
My understanding is that those items are covered by DOM, and WebIDL, which
HTML inherits from.
There's a bulk of APIs under the "webapps" group, covering much of the rest.
I think that H
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> My understanding is that those items are covered by DOM, and WebIDL, which
> HTML inherits from.
> There's a bulk of APIs under the "webapps" group, covering much of the rest.
>
> I think that HTML spec is primarily a format spec, not an A
On 3/1/2011 2:41 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote, in part (as, in the
interests of making progress, I have not cited or responded to sections of
the e-mail that did not include actionable feedback):
On 11/27/2010 2:50 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 26 Nov 201
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote, in part (as, in the
interests of making progress, I have not cited or responded to sections of
the e-mail that did not include actionable feedback):
> On 11/27/2010 2:50 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> > >
>
On 11/27/2010 2:50 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote:
I want to suggestion a reason for this impasse: the WHATWG intends to
produce a scene-graph specification. Other activities are out of scope.
I'm not sure what you really mean by "scene-graph specification",
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote:
>
> I want to suggestion a reason for this impasse: the WHATWG intends to
> produce a scene-graph specification. Other activities are out of scope.
Insofar as there is a WHATWG philosophy, it is that the spec written here
will match implementations,
All,
You may have seen me posting to the list, posting defects related to the
accessibility of the Canvas element. If you've followed those threads,
you've seen others on the list rebuke my use cases, as inappropriate
uses of existing APIs. This has happened twice, recently. In both cases,
I'
