On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Dimitri Glazkov
> wrote:
>> A typical example would be specifying an insertion point (that's
>> element) as child of a :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Both and ele
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> A typical example would be specifying an insertion point (that's
> element) as child of a :
>
>
>
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
> Both and elements have similar use cases.
This doesn't comply with the Degrade Grac
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Dimitri Glazkov
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dimitri Glazkov
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Dimitri Glazkov
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dimitri Glazkov
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Dimitri Glazkov
wro
On 2012-01-18 22:55, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
Ah, that's a good question. This also must be specified. It should
depend on the par
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dimitri Glazkov
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Dimitri Glazkov
>>> wrote:
Ah, that's a good question. This also must be specifi
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dimitri Glazkov
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Dimitri Glazkov
>> wrote:
>>> Ah, that's a good question. This also must be specified. It should
>>> depend on the parent of the element. If the p
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Dimitri Glazkov
> wrote:
>> Ah, that's a good question. This also must be specified. It should
>> depend on the parent of the element. If the parent is shadow
>> root or , then it should make the child o
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> Ah, that's a good question. This also must be specified. It should
> depend on the parent of the element. If the parent is shadow
> root or , then it should make the child of .
> Otherwise, it should use foster parenting as usual.
Oops,
Ah, that's a good question. This also must be specified. It should
depend on the parent of the element. If the parent is shadow
root or , then it should make the child of .
Otherwise, it should use foster parenting as usual.
:DG<
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> What if
What if content wrapped elements ignored by the parser. e.g.
hi
What should the content element include in that case?
- Ryosuke
On Jan 18, 2012 10:19 AM, "Dimitri Glazkov" wrote:
> 'sup, Whatwg!
>
> The new HTML elements in the shadow DOM spec
> (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip
'sup, Whatwg!
The new HTML elements in the shadow DOM spec
(http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/shadow/index.html)
and the nascent HTML templates spec (see it all explained here:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/explainer/index.html)
require tweaking of the HTML p
12 matches
Mail list logo
