Re: [whatwg] Better reference for Windows 949?

On Tue, 3 May 2011, yuhong wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > >> > >> The spec gives: > >> > >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/cc305154.aspx > >> > >> as the reference for Windows 949. If you click on the higher-byte > >> links, which ar

Re: [whatwg] Better reference for Windows 949?

Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: >> >> The spec gives: >> >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/cc305154.aspx >> >> as the reference for Windows 949. If you click on the higher-byte >> links, which are supposed to link to further code tables, the l

Re: [whatwg] Better reference for Windows 949?

On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > > The spec gives: > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/cc305154.aspx > > as the reference for Windows 949. If you click on the higher-byte > links, which are supposed to link to further code tables, the links > are broken. These links s

[whatwg] Better reference for Windows 949?

The spec gives: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/cc305154.aspx as the reference for Windows 949. If you click on the higher-byte links, which are supposed to link to further code tables, the links are broken. Maybe they were meant to link to: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc19