On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:09 AM, David Weitzman dweitz...@gmail.com wrote:
Reviving an old question here: is there anything in current or
upcoming web specs that should give me hope that I will eventually see
a day when
Reviving an old question here: is there anything in current or
upcoming web specs that should give me hope that I will eventually see
a day when sprites are either unnecessary at a protocol level or
easily supported in img tags?
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:09 AM, David Weitzman dweitz...@gmail.com wrote:
Reviving an old question here: is there anything in current or
upcoming web specs that should give me hope that I will eventually see
a day when sprites are either unnecessary at a protocol level or
easily supported in
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
It would, however, be good to have an indication where HTML would like to
see it going. Would it be better for a media fragment URI for images such as
http://example.com/picture.png#xywh=160,120,320,240 to
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
It would, however, be good to have an indication where HTML would like to
see it going. Would it be better for a media fragment URI
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
However, what exactly happens with a media fragment URI like
http://example.com/picture.png#xywh=160,120,320,240 is not fully
specified in the Media Fragment URI spec.
I would recommend fixing that. :-)
Well, that goes into
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
However, what exactly happens with a media fragment URI like
http://example.com/picture.png#xywh=160,120,320,240 is not fully
specified in the Media Fragment URI spec.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
As we adopt media fragment URIs into the HTML5 spec, we should prescribe
what the user experience is meant to be, such that UAs can implement a
consistent handling.
I don't think it makes sense to have the
On Aug 25, 2010, at 7:00 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
There are recommendations for what to do with video in the browser. I can
encourage the group to also make recommendations for what it means for images
in the browser.
However, the use of Media Fragment URIs in applications in general
On Fri, 21 May 2010, David Weitzman wrote:
There are various approaches to using image sprites with HTML and CSS,
but at the end of the day they are all essentially hacks. A solution
that would be simpler than any existing approach would be to introduce
new attributes for img to specify x
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2010, David Weitzman wrote:
There are various approaches to using image sprites with HTML and CSS,
but at the end of the day they are all essentially hacks. A solution
that would be simpler than any existing
HTTP-level solutions are vulnerable to broken proxies and caches, of which
there are many. This is why HTTP pipelining doesn't really work.
Yeah I know, but does that mean HTML should work around lack of
features in HTTP? I mean you could say HTML5 is vulnerable to broken
browsers :-)
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
HTTP-level solutions are vulnerable to broken proxies and caches, of
which
there are many. This is why HTTP pipelining doesn't really work.
Yeah I know, but does that mean HTML should work around lack of
features in HTTP? I
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
Yeah, I'd think this isn't really a problem that should be solved as
part of HTML5 but rather as improvements to the protocol level.
Spriting is after all just a hack around the strict 1-file-1-request
nature of HTTP and not
Finally, there have been proposals for removing the need to sprite
altogether, by allowing authors to send a bunch of resources packed
into a single compressed archive, and just addressing individual files
inside of it.
Yeah, I'd think this isn't really a problem that should be solved as
part
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
However, what exactly happens with a media fragment URI like
http://example.com/picture.png#xywh=160,120,320,240 is not fully
specified in the Media Fragment URI spec.
One thought was to just highlight the area
There are various approaches to using image sprites with HTML and CSS,
but at the end of the day they are all essentially hacks. A solution
that would be simpler than any existing approach would be to introduce
new attributes for img to specify x and y offsets and clipping on
images. With that you
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 10:12 -0700, David Weitzman wrote:
There are various approaches to using image sprites with HTML and CSS,
but at the end of the day they are all essentially hacks. A solution
that would be simpler than any existing approach would be to introduce
new attributes for img to
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:12 AM, David Weitzman dweitz...@gmail.com wrote:
There are various approaches to using image sprites with HTML and CSS,
but at the end of the day they are all essentially hacks. A solution
that would be simpler than any existing approach would be to introduce
new
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:12 AM, David Weitzman dweitz...@gmail.com wrote:
There are various approaches to using image sprites with HTML and CSS,
but at the end of the day they are all essentially hacks. A solution
20 matches
Mail list logo
