Am I correct in concluding that my best option is to create my own
HTML5 DTD, and use a DOCTYPE along the lines of:
!DOCTYPE html SYSTEM http://www.chaosreigns.com/DTD/html5.dtd;
?
Can the HTML5 spec be modified slightly to say that this sort of thing
complies?
(
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:21 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Am I correct in concluding that my best option is to create my own
HTML5 DTD, and use a DOCTYPE along the lines of:
!DOCTYPE html SYSTEM http://www.chaosreigns.com/DTD/html5.dtd;
?
Can the HTML5 spec be modified slightly to say
On 07/21, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
HTML5 is not an SGML or XML language. It does not use a DOCTYPE in
I thought HTML5 conformed to XML?
any way. The !DOCTYPE HTML incantation required at the top of
HTML5 pages serves the sole purpose of tricking older browsers into
rendering the document as
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:02 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 07/21, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
HTML5 is not an SGML or XML language. It does not use a DOCTYPE in
I thought HTML5 conformed to XML?
Nope. HTML5 offers an XML serialization, but it is not an XML language.
any way. The
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:02 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 07/21, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
HTML5 is not an SGML or XML language. It does not use a DOCTYPE in
I thought HTML5 conformed to XML?
any way. The !DOCTYPE HTML incantation required at the top of
HTML5 pages serves the sole
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:10 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 07/21, Eduard Pascual wrote:
in your body and there you go. Your validator should be made aware
of what is supported on each subset you are using, and you will be
able to squeeze the most from each browser you whish to support,
