Re: [whatwg] Do we need to rename the Origin header?

2009-06-24 Thread Bil Corry
Adam Barth wrote on 6/20/2009 6:25 PM: On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Bil Corryb...@corry.biz wrote: I've lost track, is this still something being considered? I should have an updated draft posted soon. I'm not clear with the new draft if it now allows Sec-From for same-origin GET

Re: [whatwg] Do we need to rename the Origin header?

2009-06-20 Thread Bil Corry
Ian Hickson wrote on 6/2/2009 8:11 PM: On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Bil Corry wrote: Related, HTML5 currently prohibits sending the XXX-Origin header for GET requests. This is to prevent intranet applications leaking their internal hostnames to external sites (are there other reasons?). However,

Re: [whatwg] Do we need to rename the Origin header?

2009-06-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Bil Corry wrote: Since the public-webapps list was never able to reconcile[1] HTML5's Origin header (now renamed XXX-Origin[2]) with CORS's Origin header[3], we're left with two headers with similar implementations and similar names. Due to this, it may prudent to