On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Rikkert Koppes wrote:
Either I am rather confused or there are some misunderstandings still. Some
observations:
Ian Hickson wrote:
Having them be orthogonal is far more useful to authors. For example,
imagine the following stylesheet:
And
I've made
Either I am rather confused or there are some misunderstandings still.
Some observations:
Ian Hickson wrote:
Having them be orthogonal is far more useful to authors. For example,
imagine the following stylesheet:
And
I've made HTML5 say that :read-write doesn't apply to disabled
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Matthew Raymond wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
I understand (and agree) that WF2 disagrees with CSS3UI and Selectors
here. I believe the error is in CSS3UI and in Selectors.
I would agree with that, although I think we disagree as to what the
error is.
Having them
Ian Hickson wrote:
I understand (and agree) that WF2 disagrees with CSS3UI and Selectors
here. I believe the error is in CSS3UI and in Selectors.
I would agree with that, although I think we disagree as to what the
error is.
Having them be orthogonal is far more useful to authors. For
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Matthew Raymond wrote:
In the Web Forms 2.0 spec, under 8.2. Relation to CSS selectors[1],
there is the following statement:
| :read-write
| Matches form control elements that do not have the readonly
| attribute set (including password fields, although
Quoting Matthew Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps you can explain to me how you justify this.
As mentioned on this mailing list when that was discussed what is currently in
the specification was done in agreement with the editor of the respective CSS
specification... Opera should have this
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Quoting Matthew Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps you can explain to me how you justify this.
As mentioned on this mailing list when that was discussed what is currently in
the specification was done in agreement with the editor of the respective CSS
