On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Garrett Smith wrote:
It would be useful to have:
HTMLFormElement.prototype.toJSONString
HTMLFormElement.prototype.getDataSetString
What are the use cases for this?
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Michael A. Puls II wrote:
Yes, these would be useful for 2 reasons that I can
Sorry, missed this when writing my earlier reply.
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Garrett Smith wrote:
Why would anyone want to serialize a FORM?
FORMs are sometimes used for XMLHttpRequest.
Using a FORM for an XHR is a more explicit than hard coding the url and
params in the javascript. It's a
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:07:38 -0500, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Garrett Smith wrote:
It would be useful to have:
HTMLFormElement.prototype.toJSONString
HTMLFormElement.prototype.getDataSetString
What are the use cases for this?
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Michael A.
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Michael A. Puls II wrote:
Are browsers actually buggy here?
You probably won't buy it, but I like the idea of using a form as a user
input data gatherer for in-page js-based apps where you do custom things
with the data and often don't actually submit the data
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:07:00 -0500, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Michael A. Puls II wrote:
Are browsers actually buggy here?
You probably won't buy it, but I like the idea of using a form as a user
input data gatherer for in-page js-based apps where you do custom
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Michael A. Puls II shadow2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:07:00 -0500, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Michael A. Puls II wrote:
Are browsers actually buggy here?
You probably won't buy it, but I like the idea of using a
I've cross-posted. Bad. I'm putting this back on WHAT WG
It's a web-app thing, but related to HTML5. HTML 5 has two lists.
On 9/24/07, Subbu Allamaraju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this approach take the enctype into account? What is the behavior if a
given form can't be serialized for a
On 8/8/07, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitchen at gmail.com wrote:
Most libraries now are providing a way to serialize a form.
It would be useful to have:
HTMLFormElement.prototype.toJSONString
HTMLFormElement.prototype.getDataSetString
HTMLFormElement.prototype.toJSONString would
On 8/8/07, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most libraries now are providing a way to serialize a form.
It would be useful to have:
HTMLFormElement.prototype.toJSONString
HTMLFormElement.prototype.getDataSetString
HTMLFormElement.prototype.toJSONString would return an object
Most libraries now are providing a way to serialize a form.
It would be useful to have:
HTMLFormElement.prototype.toJSONString
HTMLFormElement.prototype.getDataSetString
HTMLFormElement.prototype.toJSONString would return an object literal
that contains the enabled (not readonly) form element
10 matches
Mail list logo