On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:51:30 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:25:20 +0200, Doug Schepers
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What's the rationale for restricting what authors (or users) can make
>>> fullscreen?
>>>
>>
>> Y
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:51:30 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
wrote:
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:25:20 +0200, Doug Schepers
wrote:
What's the rationale for restricting what authors (or users) can make
fullscreen?
You cannot render arbitrary SVG elements without a root element as
far as I know.
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> The other day I was wondering whether I should change Fullscreen to not be
> applicable to all elements. I was thinking HTMLElement and SVGSvgElement
> () would probably be best. My reasoning was that it will not work for
> and such.
There's plent
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:25:20 +0200, Doug Schepers wrote:
What's the rationale for restricting what authors (or users) can make
fullscreen?
You cannot render arbitrary SVG elements without a root element as
far as I know.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Hey,
The other day I was wondering whether I should change Fullscreen to not be
applicable to all elements. I was thinking HTMLElement and SVGSvgElement
() would probably be best. My reasoning was that it will not work
for and such. Just now I noticed
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bu
