On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Mike Samuel wrote:
The table in section 12.5 (
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/named-character-references.html
) says
GT;U+0003E
Gt;U+0226B≫
gt;U+0003E
GT U+0003E
gt U+0003E
The table in section 12.5 (
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/named-character-references.html
) says
GT;U+0003E
Gt;U+0226B≫
gt;U+0003E
GT U+0003E
gt U+0003E
which I believe means that GT;, gt;,GT, and gt
By the way, can we have Unicode names (HTML names) for Mercury, Sun,
Earth and other planets. They are used by many astronomers on the
internet.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Mike Samuel mikesam...@gmail.com wrote:
The table in section 12.5 (
2011-12-14 19:34, Ilhan Y. wrote:
By the way, can we have Unicode names (HTML names) for Mercury, Sun,
Earth and other planets. They are used by many astronomers on the
internet.
Nice parody! But maybe people won’t take it as parody.
After all, there is no rationale given for the inclusion
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:40:04 +0100, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi
wrote:
The whole idea of extending the repertoire is wrong. We have lived with
a certain set of entity references (now being renamed “named character
references”), widely supported by browsers, except possibly in XHTML