Re: [whatwg] HTML5 named entity Gt; and Lt;

2012-02-13 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Mike Samuel wrote: The table in section 12.5 ( http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/named-character-references.html ) says GT;U+0003E Gt;U+0226B≫ gt;U+0003E GT U+0003E gt U+0003E

[whatwg] HTML5 named entity Gt; and Lt;

2011-12-14 Thread Mike Samuel
The table in section 12.5 ( http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/named-character-references.html ) says GT;U+0003E Gt;U+0226B≫ gt;U+0003E GT U+0003E gt U+0003E which I believe means that GT;, gt;,GT, and gt

Re: [whatwg] HTML5 named entity Gt; and Lt;

2011-12-14 Thread Ilhan Y.
By the way, can we have Unicode names (HTML names) for Mercury, Sun, Earth and other planets. They are used by many astronomers on the internet. On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Mike Samuel mikesam...@gmail.com wrote: The table in section 12.5 (

Re: [whatwg] HTML5 named entity Gt; and Lt;

2011-12-14 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
2011-12-14 19:34, Ilhan Y. wrote: By the way, can we have Unicode names (HTML names) for Mercury, Sun, Earth and other planets. They are used by many astronomers on the internet. Nice parody! But maybe people won’t take it as parody. After all, there is no rationale given for the inclusion

Re: [whatwg] HTML5 named entity Gt; and Lt;

2011-12-14 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:40:04 +0100, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote: The whole idea of extending the repertoire is wrong. We have lived with a certain set of entity references (now being renamed “named character references”), widely supported by browsers, except possibly in XHTML