On Mar 24, 2015, at 10:57 PM, Matthew Sotoudeh matthew...@outlook.com wrote:
Hello!
By way of introduction, I'm an author who reads some of these mailing lists
but (almost) never replies.
This proposal is quite interesting, wanted to throw in my two cents as well:
1. Would
On 03/24/2015 04:50 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
I see JavaScript as a useful tool that is seriously abused by many devs, I'm
against this. But if you do it, make damn sure it has proper CSP support.
I would like to clarify that when I say I am against this, I am not
opposed to the
On 24.03.2015 21:29, Bobby Mozumder wrote:
Also, I'm a little terrified of having SQL directly in the markup. There's
so much potential for that to go horribly wrong. Personally, I feel things
that involve data retrieval should be better handled by endpoints that
return HTML, XML, or JSON.
On 03/25/2015 12:39 AM, Janusz Majnert wrote:
OK. This makes no sense for me.
So you propose that the server does simple translation of SQL from url
to actual query, but you don't see any security issue with this?
If on the other hand you're proposing that the server validates the sql
sent
On Mar 25, 2015, at 3:39 AM, Janusz Majnert j.majn...@samsung.com wrote:
OK. This makes no sense for me.
So you propose that the server does simple translation of SQL from url to
actual query, but you don't see any security issue with this?
If on the other hand you're proposing that the
As an author I shall offer my 2 cents too.
First off, I'm for native implementations and all that markup and CSS can
do on _existing_ content.
Thus said, I prefer having JS manipulating the content with AJAX than
having the markup doing that.
Apart from the concept that markup itself is being
I think I can firmly say that I'm not in the JS all the things camp. I do
see the reasoning behind this, but I'd like to point out that not everyone
in the world would like to use the MVC model. Personally, I don't mind it
(since it offers a logical separation of data, presentation, and
https://github.com/mozumder/HTML6
I’ll be updating that Github with more ideas and refinement about the proposal
with occasional feedback into this list. Since this is getting some attention
it’s probably better to place the ideas in a setting that can be
updated/modified than to discuss it
On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Andrea Rendine master.skywalker...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't want to openly oppose to this project, as I'm anyway curious about
how it will be developed. It's only that I have seen a lot of elements used
outside their proper dynamics.
I don't see HTML as a
For the first time in my life I support JavaScript. But I want to see where
this idea will go.
Here other 2 virtual cents: please, if it ends up as a way to improve the
template element somehow compatibly with the current standard, and if it
reveals to be viable, try turning it into a proposal for
On Mar 24, 2015, at 9:51 PM, delfin del...@segonquart.net wrote:
Hi all:
I agree with you all you have quoted, Rendine.
* Neal : a problem in developing countries where low end devices are
the norm, is _de facto_ THE norme , and was the need of web
(standards).
*
Hi all:
I agree with you all you have quoted, Rendine.
* Neal : a problem in developing countries where low end devices are
the norm, is _de facto_ THE norme , and was the need of web
(standards).
* HTML6, if ever, must accomplish and adopt the so called
_retro-conditions_,
framework of
your choice.
Thanks,
Matthew Sotoudeh
From: mozum...@futureclaw.com
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:10:12 -0400
To: del...@segonquart.net
CC: wha...@whatwg.org; master.skywalker...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [whatwg] HTML6 single-page apps without Javascript proposal now
on Github
I see JavaScript as a useful tool that is seriously abused by many devs, I'm
against this. But if you do it, make damn sure it has proper CSP support.
On March 24, 2015 2:18:53 AM PDT, Bobby Mozumder mozum...@futureclaw.com
wrote:
https://github.com/mozumder/HTML6
I’ll be updating that Github
Bobby Mozumder mozum...@futureclaw.com writes:
Besides, when was the last time you actually wrote a static HTML file?
Does anyone do that?
I assume you asked a rhetorical question. Still, the answer is “Yes”.
For every web site, people actually write templates, not HTML code.
This is
On Mar 24, 2015, at 8:07 AM, Neal Gompa ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I can firmly say that I'm not in the JS all the things camp. I do
see the reasoning behind this, but I'd like to point out that not everyone
in the world would like to use the MVC model. Personally, I don't mind it
On Mar 24, 2015, at 8:19 AM, Andrea Rendine master.skywalker...@gmail.com
wrote:
As an author I shall offer my 2 cents too.
First off, I'm for native implementations and all that markup and CSS can
do on _existing_ content.
Thus said, I prefer having JS manipulating the content with AJAX
I don't want to openly oppose to this project, as I'm anyway curious about
how it will be developed. It's only that I have seen a lot of elements used
outside their proper dynamics.
I don't see HTML as a templating language, but it's probably because I'm
tied to current use cases, so I don't see
18 matches
Mail list logo
