On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, �istein E. Andersen wrote:
Hyphenation does not seem to have been discussed on this list so far,
and I think it should be.
Old proposal:
[2] http://www.nada.kth.se/i18n/html/hyph.html
While I appreciate the problems faced by Swedish, German, and othes, I
don't
Ian Hickson schrieb:
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, �istein E. Andersen wrote:
Hyphenation does not seem to have been discussed on this list so far,
and I think it should be.
Old proposal:
[2] http://www.nada.kth.se/i18n/html/hyph.html
While I appreciate the problems faced by Swedish, German, and
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Markus Ernst wrote:
While I appreciate the problems faced by Swedish, German, and othes, I
don't think this is a big enough problem to deserve solutions more
complicated than the soft hyphen at this time.
Jukka Korpela stated that the intention of the soft hyphen
Markus Ernst writes:
Ian Hickson schrieb:
I don't think this is a big enough problem to deserve solutions more
complicated than the soft hyphen at this time.
Jukka Korpela stated that the intention of the soft hyphen is not
actually a hyphenation hint:
On 11 Jan 2007, at 1:49PM, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
Prince doesn't support exception dictionaries. Is it not
possible to encode exceptions in the hyphenation dictionary?
Yes, that should be possible, actually. The encoding of certain
words in a default exception dictionary seems to be a design
Also sprach Øistein E. Andersen:
(By the way, the term
`dictionary' used to designate a set of hyphenation patterns that
are not, in general, words, is quite confusing.)
The term hypenation dictionary is quite common, but I see your
point. What would be a better name for the property?
On 11 Jan 2007, at 5:33PM, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
The term hypenation dictionary is quite common, but I see your
point. What would be a better name for the property?
hyphenation-pattern
hypenation-list
hypenation-resource
Liang's paper `Word Hy-phen-a-tion by Com-put-er', in which the
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:47:46 -, James Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW this all makes just as much sense with dictionary replaced by
stylesheet (stylesheets need to be kept in sync as new elements,
classes and ids are used rather than new words).
Not entirely. The layout and
Kornel Lesinski wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:47:46 -, James Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW this all makes just as much sense with dictionary replaced by
stylesheet (stylesheets need to be kept in sync as new elements,
classes and ids are used rather than new words).
Not entirely.
At 20:22 +0200 UTC, on 2007-01-09, Henri Sivonen wrote:
[...]
* Not knowing Dutch, the example makes me guess that the diaeresis
in Dutch has the same meaning as in French (indicate that vowels
don't form a diphthong). If this is the case, the interaction of the
diaeresis with hyphenation
Also sprach Sander Tekelenburg:
FWIW, my feeling is that it would be best if there'd be a defined format for
hyphenation rules, and browsers would accept such description files as a
plug-in. This would allow each language's specialist to write their rules,
and share them, without putting
At 02:19 +0100 UTC, on 2007-01-11, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
Also sprach Sander Tekelenburg:
FWIW, my feeling is that it would be best if there'd be a defined format
for
hyphenation rules, and browsers would accept such description files [...]
This format exists. It was pioneered by TeX
Øistein E. Andersen wrote:
Hyphenation does not seem to have been discussed on this list so far, and I
think
it should be.
General discussion:
[1] http://www.w3.org/International/O-HTML-hyphenation.html
Old proposal:
[2] http://www.nada.kth.se/i18n/html/hyph.html
[...]
The proposal
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:02:54 +0100, Øistein E. Andersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The controversy surrounding the meaning of shy; (U+00AD) is probably
over, although Opera currently seems not to render this character in
accordance with Unicode (IE7 and Safari seem to do the right thing;
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:03:04 +0100, Leons Petrazickis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would suggest that the first priority is getting a naive hyphenator
into browsers. Since you only ever need hyphenation when
full-justifying, I would suggest:
align: hyphenated;
In some typographical
Also sprach Alexey Feldgendler:
I would suggest that the first priority is getting a naive hyphenator
into browsers. Since you only ever need hyphenation when
full-justifying, I would suggest:
align: hyphenated;
In some typographical traditions, non-full-justified text is
On Jan 9, 2007, at 01:02, Øistein E. Andersen wrote:
In summary, hyphenation is a hard problem: breaking points cannot
in general
be established algorithmically; hyphenation dictionaries are not
always available
and typically do not contain long/rare/complex words (the ones that
really
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:03:04 -, Leons Petrazickis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest that the first priority is getting a naive hyphenator
into browsers. Since you only ever need hyphenation when
full-justifying
I disagree. It's also needed in narrow columns, even if they're
Kornel Lesinski wrote:
Hyphenation dictionary supplied by the page seems like a good idea, but
having it in head might cause some headaches in dynamic systems:
* in some template systems adding anything to head is difficult
* author may want to compose page from several independent fragments,
Hyphenation does not seem to have been discussed on this list so far, and I
think
it should be.
General discussion:
[1] http://www.w3.org/International/O-HTML-hyphenation.html
Old proposal:
[2] http://www.nada.kth.se/i18n/html/hyph.html
Babel (LaTeX i18n package) documentation:
20 matches
Mail list logo
