2010-11-16 04:16 EEST: Ian Hickson:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Mikko Rantalainen wrote:
>> A possible use case where this feature could be useful already (and
>> cannot be fulfilled with @required):
>>
>> 1) An user is trying to register a new user account on some system
>>and uses "foo" as the nic
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Mikko Rantalainen wrote:
> 2010-08-11 12:31 EEST: Jonas Sicking:
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Mikko Rantalainen
> > wrote:
> >> Stuff I don't want to see (combined with @required):
> >>
> >> - first option is always special
> >> - empty string as the value is special
>
On Monday 13 Sep 2010 Mounir Lamouri wrote:
2. Introduce a placeholder boolean attribute for and select
elements will suffer from being missing if there are no options selected
or selected options all have the placeholder attribute set.
I also wonder if that would be more straighforward. I s
Hi,
I am glad that select required has been accepted and introduced in the
specifications. However, I have the feeling we could try to improve that
feature.
Currently, if multiple is set or size>1, having no option selected make
the element suffering from constraint validation. If multiple is not
