2011/3/3 Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
Sounds like there are at least two feature requests here...
1) Some way of not adding the 'master' entry to the cache. This is a common
feature request, there's another thread about it specificially titled
Application Cache for on-line sites.
2011/3/3 Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
Sounds like there are at least two feature requests here...
1) Some way of not adding the 'master' entry to the cache. This is a common
feature request, there's another thread about it specificially titled
Application Cache for on-line sites.
I
I went already to bed. But i kept thinking about it. I would like to correct
myself a little, keep the idea alive and state it a little bit more clearly.
I think the functions where defined to loose or bound wrong to the
applicationCache object.
There should be the applicationCache.cache object
Oh, i am so stupid. Ok, i correct myself once again and for the last time.
After this, i go to bed, can sleep, and will
continue with reading the original text again and think about that and how
to put that together, before i write any
mail again.
First of all, i noticed, i forgot the [i] after
Yes, it does, in particular the add(), remove(), and enumerate() parts. That
spec is in the act of being dropped by the webapps working group. I think if
we want to see features along those lines, we should see them in the context
of the HTML5 AppCache.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Joseph
Sounds like there are at least two feature requests here...
1) Some way of not adding the 'master' entry to the cache. This is a common
feature request, there's another thread about it specificially titled
Application Cache for on-line sites.
2) The ability to add(), remove(), and enumerate()
Sounds related to Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving (formerly titled
DataCache API):
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DataCache/
[[[ This document defines APIs for off-line serving of requests to
HTTP resources using static and dynamic responses. It extends
the function of
Hello,
i would like to suggest an improvement for the Offline Web applications.
Problem:
I´ve found out, that i can not Cache my Joomla! Content Management System.
Of course i´ve read and heard about, that the application cache is for
static pages.
But with a little change to the spec and the
