On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 04:29:25 +0200, Asbjørn Ulsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
* : the (old) way of activating Java. Probably must also die,
though I'm unsure about this one.
Why must it die? Browsers have to support it anyway, so documenting it
and letting it pass conformance checking seem
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:59:47 +0100, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* : the (old) way of activating Java. Probably must also die,
though I'm unsure about this one.
Why must it die? Browsers have to support it anyway, so documenting it
and letting it pass conformance checking seems
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:59:47 +0100, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* : the (old) way of activating Java. Probably must also die,
though I'm unsure about this one.
Why must it die? Browsers have to support it anyway, so documenting it
and letting it pass conformance checking seems
On 23 Mar 2007, at 17:59, Henri Sivonen wrote:
pretending that doesn't exist won't make applets
disappear. :-(
Perhaps not, but this will:
applet { display: none !important; }
:o)
- Nicholas.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Mar 18, 2007, at 19:53, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
* : the (old) way of activating Java. Probably must also
die, though I'm unsure about this one.
Why must it die? Browsers have to support it anyway, so documenting
it and letting it pass conformance checking seems sensible.
I don't like
Hope it's not too late to add my opinion to the discussion about .
This posting expresses my view on the various kinds of markup for external
content.
Under external content I understand informative content presented
out-of-line of the HTML document and referenced from the latter by means
