[whatwg] Microdata feedback

2013-08-06 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Ed Summers wrote: I am looking for some guidance about the use of multiple itemtypes in microdata [1], specifically the phrase defined to use the same vocabulary in: The item types must all be types defined in applicable specifications and must all be defined to

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2011-12-09 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:04:41 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: I changed the spec as you suggest. Thanks! -- Philip Jägenstedt Core Developer Opera Software

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2011-12-08 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 9 Jul 2011, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 01:19:02 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Sat, 9 Jul 2011, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: Step 11 is If current has an itemprop attribute specified, add it to results. but should be If current has one or more

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2011-07-12 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 22:33 +, Ian Hickson wrote: The JSON algorithm now ends the crawl when it hits a loop, and replaces the offending duplicate item with the string ERROR. The RDF algorithm preserves the loops, since doing so is possible with RDF. Turns out the algorithm almost did

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2011-07-12 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:41:18 +0200, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote: On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 22:33 +, Ian Hickson wrote: The JSON algorithm now ends the crawl when it hits a loop, and replaces the offending duplicate item with the string ERROR. The RDF algorithm preserves the loops,

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2011-07-12 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Henri Sivonen wrote: On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 22:33 +, Ian Hickson wrote: The JSON algorithm now ends the crawl when it hits a loop, and replaces the offending duplicate item with the string ERROR. The RDF algorithm preserves the loops, since doing so is possible

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2011-07-09 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 01:19:02 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Sat, 9 Jul 2011, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: Step 11 is If current has an itemprop attribute specified, add it to results. but should be If current has one or more property names, add it to results. Property names are

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2011-07-08 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:33:14 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Tomasz Jamroszczak wrote: I've been looking into Microdata specification and it struck me, that crawling algorithm is so complex, when it comes to expressing simple ideas. I think that foremost the

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2011-07-08 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 21:31:49 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:33:14 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Tomasz Jamroszczak wrote: I've been looking into Microdata specification and it struck

[whatwg] Microdata feedback

2011-07-07 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Tomasz Jamroszczak wrote: I've been looking into Microdata specification and it struck me, that crawling algorithm is so complex, when it comes to expressing simple ideas. I think that foremost the algorithm should be described in the specification with explanation

[whatwg] Microdata feedback: please state that property value ordering is in the data model, and give usage guidelines

2011-06-08 Thread Dan Brickley
Hello, Reading http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/links.html#microdata Section '5.2.3 Names: the itemprop attribute' states something important about Microdata's data model, Within an item, the properties are unordered with respect to each other, except for properties

[whatwg] Microdata Feedback: A Server Side implementation of a Microdata Consumer library.

2011-02-11 Thread Emiliano Martinez Luque
Hi everybody, I originally intended to send this message to the implementors list but seeing in the archives that there hasn't been much activity there for the last couple of months, I'm sending this to the general list. Well, basically I just wanted to announce that I've just released (

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2010-01-20 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:24:46 +0100, Jeremy Keith jer...@adactio.com wrote: Hixie wrote: Finally on vCard, the final part of the extraction algorithm goes to great trouble to guess what is the family name and what is the given name. This guess will be broken for transliterated east Asian

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2010-01-20 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:58:16 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: I'd like at some point to introduce some sort of semantic textContent that handles br, pre, bdo, dir=, img alt, del, space- collapsing, and newline elimination, but there hasn't been much enthusiasm around the idea, and

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2010-01-19 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Aryeh Gregor wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: I've made it redirect to the spec. Could you say that the URL *should* provide human-readable information about the vocabulary? We all know the problems with having

[whatwg] Microdata feedback

2010-01-18 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: I've been playing with the microdata DOM APIs again, continuing the JavaScript experimental implementation http://gitorious.org/microdatajs. It's not small or elegant, but at least some spec issues have come up in the process. What is the

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2010-01-18 Thread Jeremy Keith
Hixie wrote: Finally on vCard, the final part of the extraction algorithm goes to great trouble to guess what is the family name and what is the given name. This guess will be broken for transliterated east Asian names (CJKV that I know of, maybe others too). Just saying. Also, why is it

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2010-01-18 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: I've made it redirect to the spec. Could you say that the URL *should* provide human-readable information about the vocabulary? We all know the problems with having centrally-stored machine-readable data about your specs, but

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2010-01-18 Thread Julian Reschke
Aryeh Gregor wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: I've made it redirect to the spec. Could you say that the URL *should* provide human-readable information about the vocabulary? We all know the problems with having centrally-stored machine-readable data

Re: [whatwg] Microdata feedback

2009-10-15 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:53:46 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: Shouldn't namedItem [6] be namedItems? Code like .namedItem().item(0) would be quite confusing. [6]

[whatwg] Microdata feedback

2009-10-14 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: The spec says that properties can also themselves be groups of name-value pairs, but this isn't exposed in a very convenient way in the DOM API. The 'properties' DOM-property is a HTMLPropertyCollection of all associated elements. Discovering