Re: [whatwg] Move RequestAnimationFrame steps into HTML?

Web animation is --to my knowledge-- only for the manipulation of the dom's children element and to some extent the dom itself. What of the canvas? Is there any interest in simplifying or and adding on to the requestAnimationFrame? Like making it a constructor or making Daemon object to better

Re: [whatwg] Move RequestAnimationFrame steps into HTML?

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, James Robinson wrote: > > I'd be happy to do this. I've filed a bug to track it: > >https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.I can't speak for the editors > of that spec, but I'm pretty sure thcgi?id=26839 >

Re: [whatwg] Move RequestAnimationFrame steps into HTML?

On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, James Robinson wrote: > > Cameron and I are editors of the "Timing control for script-based > animations" spec, more commonly known as the spec for > requestAnimationFrame. This spec has some outstanding feedback from > folks like Anne that needs to be addressed at a basic

[whatwg] Move RequestAnimationFrame steps into HTML?

Cameron and I are editors of the "Timing control for script-based animations" spec, more commonly known as the spec for requestAnimationFrame. This spec has some outstanding feedback from folks like Anne that needs to be addressed at a basic editorial level that I haven't had bandwidth to address