Am 19.05.2011 20:39 schrieb Aryeh Gregor:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Markus Ernstderer...@gmx.ch wrote:
While discussing about contenteditable elements, the WYSIWYG aspect was
mentioned. For real WYSIWYG in a text editor of a CMS, Blog, Forum or
whatever, it would be necessary for the
Hello
While discussing about contenteditable elements, the WYSIWYG aspect was
mentioned. For real WYSIWYG in a text editor of a CMS, Blog, Forum or
whatever, it would be necessary for the contents of the contenteditable
element to:
- Disable the styles of the surrounding page
- Enable the
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Special cases:
- If the linked CSS document contains declarations for the body element,
they are applied to the contenteditable element itself. (This could be
necessary in case of light text on dark backgrounds, where you
On 5/17/11 11:23 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Markus Ernstderer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Special cases:
- If the linked CSS document contains declarations for the body element,
they are applied to the contenteditable element itself. (This could be
necessary in case of
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 5/17/11 11:23 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Markus Ernstderer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Special cases:
- If the linked CSS document contains declarations for the body element,
they are applied to
On 5/17/11 2:40 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Doesn't really matter to me; either seems sensical. :root has the
benefit of existing. ^_^
:scope has the benefit of making more sense (and happens to exist in my
tree, is used in the proposed selectors API, etc).
-Boris
