*The problem:*
document.querySelector and document.querySelectorAll
are long and used a lot.
Lines in the code are long.
*Proposal:*
q('.my-div')
will be equal to:
document.querySelector('.my-div)
qq('.my-div')
will be equal to:
document.querySelectorAll('.my-div')
--Leon Gilyadov.
So you're suggesting new globals that are bound to the document? That
sounds really bad. Also, there's no reason to suggest an alias to
querySelector() when it's much more likely that query() will be used by the
majority of developers.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Leon Gilyadov
The spec should only concern itself with exposing functionality. Practical
considerations such as length of code are the responsibility of the developer -
if you like to have q and qq aliases you can add them yourself at runtime,
that's the whole point of a prototyped language. Common libraries
Aww, accidentally did a direct reply instead of replying to the list. :(
On Sep 18, 2013 7:01 AM, James Greene james.m.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
var q = document.querySelector;
var qq = document.querySelectorAll;
On Sep 18, 2013 3:14 AM, Leon Gilyadov leon.gilya...@gmail.com wrote:
*The
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:18:05 +0200, James Greene
james.m.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
Aww, accidentally did a direct reply instead of replying to the list. :(
On Sep 18, 2013 7:01 AM, James Greene james.m.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
var q = document.querySelector;
var qq = document.querySelectorAll;
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Niels Keurentjes
niels.keurent...@omines.com wrote:
The spec should only concern itself with exposing functionality. Practical
considerations such as length of code are the responsibility of the
developer - if you like to have q and qq aliases you can add them
On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Niels Keurentjes
niels.keurent...@omines.com (mailto:niels.keurent...@omines.com) wrote:
The spec should only concern itself with exposing functionality. Practical
considerations such as
