On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> What exactly is it you want moved, from where to where? Just the "origin
> of a URL"? I'm guessing Adam would be interested in revving the Origin
> spec to be more accurate if there's a problem with it; that would be my
> preference if at all p
On Wed, 22 May 2013, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> As Bj?rn points out in
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/current/msg01512.html
> defining origin of a URL in terms of STD66 is broken. So we should
> define it in terms of the URL Standard.
>
> The Origin header also has problems, as
As Björn points out in
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/current/msg01512.html
defining origin of a URL in terms of STD66 is broken. So we should
define it in terms of the URL Standard.
The Origin header also has problems, as it suggests you can have a
space-separated list, which we disa
