Re: [whatwg] Revised Plan for Server-sent DOM events

2008-01-07 Thread Kornel Lesinski
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:30:29 -, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Continued problems of the 2 connection limit on HTTP server scalability Is there any realistic solution to this other than to use separate domains and have cross-domain working? Sharing of event-source co

Re: [whatwg] Revised Plan for Server-sent DOM events

2008-01-07 Thread Kornel Lesinski
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:51:29 -, Henry Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Unnecessary dependency on DOM Events This feature is inherently event-based. I think it does make sense to re-use existing framework for event handling. However, I haven't found use-case for remote triggering of s

Re: [whatwg] Revised Plan for Server-sent DOM events

2008-01-07 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Dan Mosedale wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> - Continued problems of the 2 connection limit on HTTP server >>> scalability >> Is there any realistic solution to this other than to use separate >> domains and have cross-domain working? > Simply get rid of, or significantly raise, the limit?

Re: [whatwg] Revised Plan for Server-sent DOM events

2008-01-07 Thread Dan Mosedale
Anne van Kesteren wrote: - Continued problems of the 2 connection limit on HTTP server scalability Is there any realistic solution to this other than to use separate domains and have cross-domain working? Simply get rid of, or significantly raise, the limit? Standards work related to this prob

Re: [whatwg] Revised Plan for Server-sent DOM events

2008-01-07 Thread Stewart Brodie
Henry Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's recently been some talk about completely removing HTML 5 > section 6.2, "Server-sent DOM events". I propose that rather than > remove, we revise. > > The major concerns I've heard about section 6.2 include: > > - Unnecessary dependency on DOM

Re: [whatwg] Revised Plan for Server-sent DOM events

2008-01-07 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:51:29 +0100, Henry Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There's recently been some talk about completely removing HTML 5 section 6.2, "Server-sent DOM events". I propose that rather than remove, we revise. I agree that we should keep it. - Continued problems of the 2 co

[whatwg] Revised Plan for Server-sent DOM events

2008-01-04 Thread Henry Mason
There's recently been some talk about completely removing HTML 5 section 6.2, "Server-sent DOM events". I propose that rather than remove, we revise. The major concerns I've heard about section 6.2 include: - Unnecessary dependency on DOM Events - Redundancy with already existing techniques,