On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Channy Yun wrote:
If anyone knows good positions or opinion to discuss this issue, please
let me know.
I would recommend contacting the public-weba...@w3.org mailing list. If
that working group is interested in following this, the chairs can invite
you relevant parties
Ian,
Anyway I thank you for your careful consideration and encouragement of
another activities.
Basically web signature must be implemented by browser venders because of an
example of XKMS's fail that Anders indicated. So we have to consider how to
do is cost effective and I think form
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Over the years a number of e-mails have been sent to the list about
signatures and other public key cryptography topics, most of which are
quoted below.
For a number of reasons, not least of which my lack of expertise in
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Channy Yun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The national PKI system has own certificate issuing process to citizen with
face-to-face meeting. And it requires to submit ones client certificate
for e-government and financial transaction with digital signature per each
Andres,
Thanks for your long effort in this issue. I know there is many issues of
more secure solution and specification for financial transactions. But, it
has been processed most of bank transaction and cyber trading in web browser
form. So new protocol and new specification is not good
Thanks for your follow up about long silence issue.
In my understanding, the implementation guide of browsers is most important
part of HTML5.
As you know, web browsers have offered the authentication of client
certificate over SSL per web site. It is widely used by many companies and
Over the years a number of e-mails have been sent to the list about
signatures and other public key cryptography topics, most of which are
quoted below.
For a number of reasons, not least of which my lack of expertise in the
area, the size of the HTML5 spec today, and the low level of demand
