On 8/2/11, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Unfortunately, as I said above... what we want and what we get don't
> always match. There's not much we can do here to push authors further.
On the other hand, why accommodate the desires of authors? Why let
authors decide whether I use gold on black or black on wh
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> On 5/4/11, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >> IMO browsers should implement . should be implementable
> >> cross-browser in CSS.
> >
> > Unfortunately, what we want and what we get don't always match. :-)
>
> On a more serious note, implementing can't be that
On 5/4/11, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> IMO browsers should implement . should be implementable
>> cross-browser in CSS.
>
> Unfortunately, what we want and what we get don't always match. :-)
>
I'll be a dick and quote your sig:
> Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Nicholas Zakas wrote:
>
> In section 4.4.5 (the aside element), an example is given that shows
> being used within .
>
> Section 4.4.3 (the nav element), explains that this would be an
> inappropriate use of
> (http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-nav-element):
On 1/24/11, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>>
>> But then, when should hyperlinks be created with s?
>
> More or less never. links don't show on most Web browsers.
>
IMO browsers should implement . should be implementable
cross-browser in CSS.
>
>> And what
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Nicholas Zakas wrote:
>
> Ah, I misinterpreted. With this in mind, I'm a bit unclear as to when
> should be used. If it's intended for primary navigation but
> secondary navigation can also be marked up with it, does that mean it's
> best to use whenever you have more than
2011 3:58 PM
To: Nicholas Zakas
Cc: wha...@whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Small consistency issue with HTML5 nav element examples
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Nicholas Zakas wrote:
>
> In section 4.4.5 (the aside element), an example is given that shows
> being used within .
>
> Section
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Nicholas Zakas wrote:
>
> In section 4.4.5 (the aside element), an example is given that shows
> being used within .
>
> Section 4.4.3 (the nav element), explains that this would be an
> inappropriate use of
> (http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-nav-element):
In section 4.4.5 (the aside element), an example is given that shows
being used within .
Section 4.4.3 (the nav element), explains that this would be an inappropriate
use of (http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-nav-element):
"Not all groups of links on a page need to be in a nav el
