On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
They can follow the links (not following the links is a should not,
not a must not). Once they follow the links, they must ignore the
type= attribute and only take into account the
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
Sure. For example, the UA might want to display the list of resources to
the user. In such a UI, if the UI includes types, it would have to use the
type= attribute's value as the type.
That seems very speculative. Does any UA
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
Sure. For example, the UA might want to display the list of resources to
the user. In such a UI, if the UI includes types, it would have to use the
type= attribute's value as the type.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
In 4.2.4:
If the attribute is present, then the user agent must assume that
the resource is of the given type. If the attribute is omitted, but
the external resource link type has
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
They can follow the links (not following the links is a should not, not
a must not). Once they follow the links, they must ignore the type=
attribute and only take into account the MIME type provided by the server.
I was assuming
Tab Atkins Jr. writes:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Aryeh
Gregorsimetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't noticed many progress bars on the web
You see them a lot more in the indeterminate form, as a 'spinner'
image or the like. ... I suspect, though, that there are a lot of
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:34:47 +0200, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd think that the author in this use-case is not likely to be happy using
an unstyle-able progress element and getting some kind of unknown
appearance that might clash with their color scheme or such.
You seem
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Aryeh Gregorsimetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Anne van Kesterenann...@opera.com wrote:
You seem to base most of your argument on that progress will not be
stylable. I think the idea is that it will be stylable though.
Yes, I
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
First, a general remark: what's the difference supposed to be between
PASS and BUG? Firefox and WebKit are listed as PASS and BUG in
these two cases respectively, for instance:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
In 4.2.4:
If the attribute is present, then the user agent must assume that the
resource is of the given type. If the attribute is omitted, but the
external resource link type has a default type defined, then the user
agent
First, a general remark: what's the difference supposed to be between
PASS and BUG? Firefox and WebKit are listed as PASS and BUG in
these two cases respectively, for instance:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/dom.html#interactions-with-xpath-and-xslt
11 matches
Mail list logo
