On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Joseph Pecoraro wrote:
The storage event [1] fires for both sessionStorage and localStorage.
To me, this means if you only want to interact with localStorage you
will have to manually ensure that it is the storage area being modified:
We could make Storage into an EventTarget and also fire events on
there,
sure. As Jeremy said, this is something that might best be done in the
next version; we're still trying to get the current features
implemented
in a stable and consistent fashion as it is.
Sounds great. Although
This doesn't break anything in the current spec. So it wouldn't
break
any existing implementations. I'm also guessing that the groundwork
for implementing a feature like this is already in place due to the
ubiquity of addEventListener.
To be frank, it seems like a lot of bloat though to
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:45:34 +0200, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Seems like a reasonable idea. I don't know if it's been brought up
before. My guess is that Ian will say this should be re-examined for HTML6,
though.
Seems like that would be a bit too late; given existing
Is it too late? It seems as though Joseph's suggestion could be in addition
to what's already in the spec.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:45:34 +0200, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
Seems like a reasonable idea. I
Jeremy Orlow: Is it too late? It seems as though Joseph's
suggestion could be in addition to what's already in the spec.
This doesn't break anything in the current spec. So it wouldn't break
any existing implementations. I'm also guessing that the groundwork
for implementing a feature
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:51:18 +0200, Joseph Pecoraro joepec...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeremy Orlow: Is it too late? It seems as though Joseph's
suggestion could be in addition to what's already in the spec.
This doesn't break anything in the current spec. So it wouldn't break
any existing
Seems like a reasonable idea. I don't know if it's been brought up before.
My guess is that Ian will say this should be re-examined for HTML6, though.
J
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Joseph Pecoraro joepec...@gmail.comwrote:
It sounds like there wasn't any discussion on this. I recently
Seems like a reasonable idea. I don't know if it's been brought up
before. My guess is that Ian will say this should be re-examined
for HTML6, though.
Very cool. Let me know if I can help at all to push this idea forward.
- Joe
-
De : whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org]
De la part de Joseph Pecoraro
Envoyé : lundi 22 juin 2009 18:56
À : Jeremy Orlow
Cc : whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Objet : Re: [whatwg] Storage Events for a Specific Storage Area
Seems like a reasonable idea. I don't know
It sounds like there wasn't any discussion on this. I recently heard
talk of other potential Storage areas [2]. That would make this idea
even more appealing to me. Does this sound like something worth
adding? Any comments?
[2]:
The storage event [1] fires for both sessionStorage and
localStorage. To me, this means if you only want to interact with
localStorage you will have to manually ensure that it is the storage
area being modified:
window.addEventListener('storage', function(e) {
if ( e.storageArea ===
12 matches
Mail list logo
