Re: [whatwg] URL: test case review

2014-10-06 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote: http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/10/05/urltest-results/24f081633d This does not match what I find in browsers. (I did not look through the list exhaustively, see below, but since this was the first one...) I also found

Re: [whatwg] URL: test case review

2014-10-06 Thread Sam Ruby
On 10/06/2014 12:42 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote: http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/10/05/urltest-results/24f081633d This does not match what I find in browsers. (I did not look through the list exhaustively, see below,

Re: [whatwg] URL: test case review

2014-10-06 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote: On 10/06/2014 12:42 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote: http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/10/05/urltest-results/24f081633d This does not match what I find

Re: [whatwg] URL: test case review

2014-10-06 Thread Sam Ruby
On 10/06/2014 12:59 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote: On 10/06/2014 12:42 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:

[whatwg] URL: test case review

2014-10-05 Thread Sam Ruby
I've been reviewing urltestdata[1], and I've identified a number of results that seem problematic, questionable, marginal, or otherwise worth further discussion. More specifically, I've been comparing the expected results against what a number of browsers produce. I've not gone back and