On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, fantasai wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, fantasai wrote: > > > > > Please tell me you don't expect conformance checkers to check for > > > potentially invalid JavaScript output... > > > > Obviously not, as that is mathematically impossible. > > Then, please make that exception explicit in the conformance > requirements section. Currently the only normatively allowed > exception is for "interpretation of the author's intent" -- > and checking script output doesn't fall into that category.
This ended up being done a while back. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
