Re: [whatwg] Websockets: dropped packets? (Jonathan Chetwynd)

2011-05-30 Thread Bob Gezelter
. It would also clarify starkly those details that are specific to the TCP/HTTP binding, and which may be unnecessary or inappropriate in the context of a different transport. - Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com > Original Message > Subject: Re: [whatwg] Websockets:

Re: [whatwg] Websockets: dropped packets? (Jonathan Chetwynd)

2011-05-29 Thread Harald Alvestrand
On 03/31/11 14:53, Bob Gezelter wrote: Jonathan, The WebSocket protocol currently presumes TCP as the underlying transport. TCP connections are an uninterrupted stream. If a packet is lost, the connection will be aborted. I do not believe that the TCP dependency is truly necessary or benefi

Re: [whatwg] Websockets: dropped packets? (Jonathan Chetwynd)

2011-03-31 Thread pete
On 31 Mar 2011 07:51:01 -0500 Bob Gezelter wrote: > TCP connections are an uninterrupted stream. If a packet is lost, the > connection will be aborted. Lost packets are retransmitted. From "Unix Network Programming", by W. Richard Stevens, page 205: "TCP provides a connection-oriented, reliabl

Re: [whatwg] Websockets: dropped packets? (Jonathan Chetwynd)

2011-03-31 Thread Bob Gezelter
Jonathan, The WebSocket protocol currently presumes TCP as the underlying transport. TCP connections are an uninterrupted stream. If a packet is lost, the connection will be aborted. I do not believe that the TCP dependency is truly necessary or beneficial. WADR, it would be far more appropriat