On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:48:42 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
[...]
I finally updated XMLHttpRequest to make use of your changes. Thanks!
(I.e. it no longer mentions cookie-free as that is implied and it now
defines the origin of Document objects.)
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:58:52 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
2) Is there any reason we cannot also use this no browsing context
clause to define document.cookie rather than having a special
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
If we can do all this that should turn it into a one-way dependency
with most definitions being completely self-contained.
I'm not sure it's worth it in the case of the origin thing.
So what happens when we define how to
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
1) document.location returns null when there is no browsing context for
the Document. document.defaultView needs this too. (It returns null in
the implementations I tested.)
Done.
2) Is there any reason we cannot also use this no browsing
Thanks for the changes, some comments below.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:58:52 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
2) Is there any reason we cannot also use this no browsing context
clause to define document.cookie rather than having a special type
Ian, if you could tackle the following soonish that would be nice as I try
to get the test suite for XMLHttpRequest together.
1) document.location returns null when there is no browsing context for
the Document. document.defaultView needs this too. (It returns null in the
implementations I
