On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> > I'm studying some of the feedback raised over the past few months
> > regarding history.pushState() and related APIs, in particular in the
> > context of applying these changes to the spec:
> >
>
Hixie's explanation of why the event should be sync makes sense to me.
I recall that Olli had an objection other than this race condition,
but now I can't find the e-mail!
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>
>> I'm study
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> I'm studying some of the feedback raised over the past few months
> regarding history.pushState() and related APIs, in particular in the
> context of applying these changes to the spec:
>
> http://hacks.mozilla.org/2011/03/history-api-chang
I'm studying some of the feedback raised over the past few months
regarding history.pushState() and related APIs, in particular in the
context of applying these changes to the spec:
http://hacks.mozilla.org/2011/03/history-api-changes-in-firefox-4/
One of the differences between the spec an
