On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp
wrote:
> Eitan Adler writes:
>
>> On 25 July 2016 at 14:59, Nils Dagsson Moskopp <
>> n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Eitan Adler writes:
>>> > See also
Eitan Adler writes:
> On 25 July 2016 at 14:59, Nils Dagsson Moskopp <
> n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote:
>
>> Eitan Adler writes:
>> > See also the remainder of my email.
>>
>> I do not understand. What do you mean?
>>
>
> Please re-read the
On 25 July 2016 at 14:59, Nils Dagsson Moskopp <
n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote:
> Eitan Adler writes:
> > See also the remainder of my email.
>
> I do not understand. What do you mean?
>
Please re-read the original email of the thread.
I am arguing that *neither*
Eitan Adler writes:
> On 25 July 2016 at 13:32, Nils Dagsson Moskopp <
> n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote:
>
>> Eitan Adler writes:
>>
>> > At the moment if you'd like the user to enter *only* digits (no
>> separators,
>> > +, -, etc.) you must
On 25 July 2016 at 13:32, Nils Dagsson Moskopp <
n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote:
> Eitan Adler writes:
>
> > At the moment if you'd like the user to enter *only* digits (no
> separators,
> > +, -, etc.) you must resort to a hack
> >
> >
> >
> > This results in a
Eitan Adler writes:
> At the moment if you'd like the user to enter *only* digits (no separators,
> +, -, etc.) you must resort to a hack
>
>
>
> This results in a correct "digits only" keyboard on some mobile keyboards
> (and nothing on desktops).
Why do you see a
At the moment if you'd like the user to enter *only* digits (no separators,
+, -, etc.) you must resort to a hack
This results in a correct "digits only" keyboard on some mobile keyboards
(and nothing on desktops).
There are several use cases for digits only, but the main ones that come to