Re: [whatwg] relationship between labeled control and label for :active and :hover pseudos

2015-01-07 Thread Florian Rivoal
> On 07 Jan 2015, at 00:29, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Florian Rivoal wrote: >> >> :hover matches on the labeled control of a label element currently >> matching :hover. >> >> Similarly, :active interoperably matches on the labeled control of a >> label element currently mat

Re: [whatwg] relationship between labeled control and label for :active and :hover pseudos

2015-01-06 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Florian Rivoal wrote: > > :hover matches on the labeled control of a label element currently > matching :hover. > > Similarly, :active interoperably matches on the labeled control of a > label element currently matching :active (and > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug

Re: [whatwg] relationship between labeled control and label for :active and :hover pseudos

2014-11-26 Thread Florian Rivoal
> >> On 10 Nov 2014, at 15:23, Florian Rivoal wrote: >> >> I suggest making this propagation of the :hover and :active state between >> label and labeled control bidirectional for both :hover and :active. >> > On 10 Nov 2014, at 16:38, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > "The label", or "the labels"? >

Re: [whatwg] relationship between labeled control and label for :active and :hover pseudos

2014-11-15 Thread Florian Rivoal
> On 14 Nov 2014, at 21:34, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > On Nov 10, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > >> On 11/10/14, 5:31 PM, Florian Rivoal wrote: >>> That said, the labeled control also maintains a list of references to the >>> associated labels, so there is no particular difficulty invo

Re: [whatwg] relationship between labeled control and label for :active and :hover pseudos

2014-11-14 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Nov 10, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 11/10/14, 5:31 PM, Florian Rivoal wrote: >> That said, the labeled control also maintains a list of references to the >> associated labels, so there is no particular difficulty involved in finding >> them. > > The difficulty is not finding

Re: [whatwg] relationship between labeled control and label for :active and :hover pseudos

2014-11-10 Thread Florian Rivoal
> On 10 Nov 2014, at 16:38, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > On 11/10/14, 9:23 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote: >> that authors occasionally ask for by the ability to style the label based on >> the state of the labeled control > > "The label", or "the labels"? > > The problem of "hover the control if the l

Re: [whatwg] relationship between labeled control and label for :active and :hover pseudos

2014-11-10 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 11/10/14, 5:31 PM, Florian Rivoal wrote: That said, the labeled control also maintains a list of references to the associated labels, so there is no particular difficulty involved in finding them. The difficulty is not finding them. The difficulty is efficiently updating hover state on t

Re: [whatwg] relationship between labeled control and label for :active and :hover pseudos

2014-11-10 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 11/10/14, 9:23 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote: that authors occasionally ask for by the ability to style the label based on the state of the labeled control "The label", or "the labels"? The problem of "hover the control if the label is hovered" is simple: the label already has a reference to t

[whatwg] relationship between labeled control and label for :active and :hover pseudos

2014-11-10 Thread Florian Rivoal
:hover matches on the labeled control of a label element currently matching :hover. Similarly, :active interoperably matches on the labeled control of a label element currently matching :active (and https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27247 is about reflecting that in the spec) In