On Mon, 21 Jan 2013, L. David Baron wrote:
I thought I'd brought this issue up before, but I can't seem to find a
record of it.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/semantics.html#attr-style-scoped
currently says that, inside scoped style sheets, @page rules are
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:33 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
You could make the same argument against most of @scoped: you don't need
to
define a scoped style for a class, just use a different class name.
I think for the rest of @scoped, there are both significant
performance
On Sunday 2013-02-17 11:35 -0600, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:39 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
But I think it's a large amount of extra implementation complexity
to honor @-rules whose purpose is to build global dictionaries (in
particular, @keyframes and
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:39 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
But I think it's a large amount of extra implementation complexity
to honor @-rules whose purpose is to build global dictionaries (in
particular, @keyframes and @font-face), and I suspect the end result
of honoring them
On Monday 2013-01-21 11:17 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:39 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
Thus I think the specification should mandate that @keyframes and
@font-face are ignored in scoped style sheets, just like @page.
I think it would also be good
I thought I'd brought this issue up before, but I can't seem to find
a record of it.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/semantics.html#attr-style-scoped
currently says that, inside scoped style sheets, @page rules are
ignored, but other @-rules are honored, scoped either
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:39 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
I thought I'd brought this issue up before, but I can't seem to find
a record of it.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/semantics.html#attr-style-scoped
currently says that, inside scoped style
