On Tue, 3 May 2011, Roger Hågensen wrote:
Is there a need for say a pbr ? (short for paragraph break) default
behavior being the same as two br.
Isn't that just two paragraphs separate from each other?
p ... /p p ... /p
Then again getting folks to change would be hard, so maybe a cp
Kornel Lesiński wrote:
Parsing of non-HTML elements is not interoperable between IE and non-IE
browsers. IE already supports self-closing syntax on prefixed elements,
but other browsers don't:
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 07:18:52 -, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
For example, markup such as the following is sadly common:
p/Hello world!/p
I have therefore not changed the spec in response to this request.
I've checked www.dotnetdotcom.org dataset looking for tag…/…/tag,
2010/12/31 Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net:
I think HTML5 can specify that a fixed set of old HTML elements has to be
closed according to HTML rules, but all other elements support self-closing
syntax like XML.
That just makes the HTML syntax even more complicated and confusing.
At least
Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch writes:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, William F Hammond wrote:
In the spec at 8.1.2.1 (6) (for the text/html serialization):
The section number refers to the W3C version at
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/
Then, if the element is one of the void elements, or if the
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, William F Hammond wrote:
In the spec at 8.1.2.1 (6) (for the text/html serialization):
Then, if the element is one of the void elements, or if the
element is a foreign element, then there may be a single U+002F
SOLIDUS character (/). This character has no
Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net writes:
* William F Hammond wrote:
Does anyone seriously think that foo/ is an ordinary open tag?
They do if it's like in `a href=http://example.org/`.
Well, the spec (w3 version) has detailed parsing rules for text/html
in section 8.2. I _think_ those
[Originally mailed to whatwg on Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:24:49 -0400,
but blocked from the list due to subscription troubles]
In the spec at 8.1.2.1 (6) (for the text/html serialization):
Then, if the element is one of the void elements, or if the
element is a foreign element, then there may
On 9/26/10 4:12 PM, William F Hammond wrote:
For example, while it is true that major browsers seem to treat p/
as an open tag, the relevant question for backward comptatibility is
whether anyone has been relying on the idea that p/ can be used to
begin a non-empty paragraph.
Sites rely on
For example, while it is true that major browsers seem to treat p/
as an open tag, the relevant question for backward comptatibility is
whether anyone has been relying on the idea that p/ can be used to
begin a non-empty paragraph.
Sites unfortunately do things like that so we cannot
* William F Hammond wrote:
Does anyone seriously think that foo/ is an ordinary open tag?
They do if it's like in `a href=http://example.org/`.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjo...@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
11 matches
Mail list logo
