.
>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 4:36 AM David Bruant wrote:
>>
>>> Le 28/11/2017 à 00:48, Jonathan Zuckerman a écrit :
>>> You’re probably aware there are libraries that offer functionality of
>> this
>>> sort (debounce and throttle in underscore/lodash is the one I’m most
Maybe there should be
David,
To clarify your message: it sounds like it is primarily feedback to
Jonathan about the fact that a wide range of use cases and awareness of
options exist in the Web community at large, and also that some of the
existing options in the addEventListener parameters are useful even though
one m
Le 28/11/2017 à 00:48, Jonathan Zuckerman a écrit :
You’re probably aware there are libraries that offer functionality of this
sort (debounce and throttle in underscore/lodash is the one I’m most
familiar with) and the web community seems content to add a small
dependency when such functionality
>From my own experience, only about half of the times I’ve required debounce
or throttle has been related to event handling, so if your proposal was
accepted I’d still need to include a library to satisfy the other scenarios.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 00:01 Sylon Zero wrote:
> I think libraries hav
I think libraries having those functions emphasizes the point here, as that
validates the existence and need for those patterns which then raises the
requirement: should this be native to the browser?
I believe the answer is yes, given how much work has already been put into
standardizing the reso
You’re probably aware there are libraries that offer functionality of this
sort (debounce and throttle in underscore/lodash is the one I’m most
familiar with) and the web community seems content to add a small
dependency when such functionality is required. How would you convince
browser vendors to